Site icon swarb.co.uk

Cases of Pini And Bertani And Manera And Atripaldi v Romania: ECHR 22 Jun 2004

The making of an adoption order was sufficient to establish an Article 8 right to respect for family life notwithstanding the fact that the children had never moved to live with the adopters. Protection of the right to family life pre-supposes the factual existence of family life.

Citations:

78030/01, [2004] ECHR 275, 78028/01, [2005] Fam Law 697, 40 EHRR 13, (2005) 40 EHRR 13, [2005] 2 FLR 596

Links:

Worldlii, Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedWebster (the Parents) v Norfolk County Council and others CA 11-Feb-2009
Four brothers and sisters had been adopted after the parents had been found to have abused them. The parents now had expert evidence that the injuries may have been the result of scurvy, and sought leave to appeal.
Held: Leave was refused. . .
CitedA v P (Surrogacy: Parental Order: Death of Applicant) FD 8-Jul-2011
M applied for a parental order under the 2008 Act. The child had been born through a surrogacy arrangement in India, which was lawful there, but would have been unlawful here. The clinic could not guarantee a biological relationship with the child. . .
CitedA v P (Surrogacy: Parental Order: Death of Applicant) FD 8-Jul-2011
M applied for a parental order under the 2008 Act. The child had been born through a surrogacy arrangement in India, which was lawful there, but would have been unlawful here. The clinic could not guarantee a biological relationship with the child. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights, Adoption

Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230509

Exit mobile version