Citations:
2899/66, [1972] ECHR 1, 2832/66, 2835/66
Links:
Statutes:
European Convention on Human Rights
Citing:
See Also – In re De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v Belgium (No 1) ECHR 18-Nov-1970
The applicants had been detained under Belgian vagrancy laws. An earlier decision had found that their rights had been infringed because of the lack of effective means for them to challenge their detention. The Belgian government said that the . .
See Also – De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v Belgium ECHR 18-Jun-1971
ECHR Judgment (Just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient 2832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights
Updated: 05 November 2022; Ref: scu.465134