Carlton v Goodman: CA 29 Apr 2002

The defendant claimed an interest in a house. The deceased had been a sitting tenant, and wanted to purchase his house. He could not obtain finance alone, and she joined with him, becoming liable under the mortgage. She did not live in the house until after his death. She claimed the house. No formal document regulated the arrangement.
Held: A resulting trust had been established to hold the entire house on trust for the estate in the absence of any actual monetary contribution. The case was ‘an interesting point on resulting trusts in a case where the purchase of property acquired for the sole use and occupation of one party is partly financed by a joint mortgage on the property’ and ‘Midland Bank v Cooke itself can only be properly understood when it is appreciated that the court was satisfied that by the making of a direct contribution a resulting trust had been established in the wife’s favour of some part of the beneficial interest and the real question for the court in that case was to determine what proportions the parties must have been assumed to have intended for their beneficial ownership.’
Lords Justice Ward, Mummery and Laws
[2002] 2 FLR 259, Gazette 30-May-2002, [2002] EWCA Civ 545
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedMidland Bank v Cooke and Another CA 13-Jul-1995
Equal equitable interest inferrable without proof
The bank sought to enforce a charge given by the husband to secure a business loan. The property was purchased from the husband’s and his family’s resources and the loan, and was in his name. There had been no discussion or agreement between husband . .

Cited by:
CitedOxley v Hiscock CA 6-May-2004
oxley_hiscockCA2004
The parties were not married, but had brought together their resources to purchase a home in the name of one of them. Nothing had been said about the respective shares on which the property was to be held.
Held: The shares were to be assessed . .
CitedFowler v Barron CA 23-Apr-2008
fowler_barronCA2008
The parties had lived together for many years but without marrying. The house had been put in joint names, but without specific advice on the issue or any express declaration of trust. In practice Mr Barron made the direct payments for the house and . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 05 May 2021; Ref: scu.170231