Site icon swarb.co.uk

Capital Bank Plc v Mcdiarmid: CA 7 Feb 2006

The defendant was said to have guaranteed a hire purchase agreement. The principle, a company, had become insolvent. He denied having signed the document.
Held: Leave to appeal should not be granted. The court considered further evidence. That evidence failed the first test in Ladd v Marshall, and was not to be admitted. The recorder had carefully examined the evidence before him and was entitled to reach the conclusions he had.

Citations:

[2006] EWCA Civ 226

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedBanks and Another v Cox and Another CA 17-Jul-2000
The court considered the principles of admitting new evidence on appeal after the introduction of the new rules. Moritt LJ: ‘In my view the principles reflecting in the rules in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 remain relevant to any application . .
CitedHamilton v Al Fayed (2) CA 13-Oct-2000
A third party who financially supported a court action had no right to be joined as a party even at hearings at which decisions would be made which might affect his potential liabilities. Those who financially support proceedings must acknowledge . .
CitedLadd v Marshall CA 29-Nov-1954
Conditions for new evidence on appeal
At the trial, the wife of the appellant’s opponent said she had forgotten certain events. After the trial she began divorce proceedings, and informed the appellant that she now remembered. He sought either to appeal admitting fresh evidence, or for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Banking

Updated: 06 August 2022; Ref: scu.239210

Exit mobile version