(Decided in 1976) ‘inexpedient’ in the rule, simply means unjust. Because there was not the requisite identity of parties, the strict requirements of set off were not fulfilled.
Citations:
[1987] 1 WLR 813
Statutes:
Cited by:
Cited – Inveresk Plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd SC 5-May-2010
The parties had undertaken the sale of a business (from I to TR) with part of the consideration to be payable on later calculation of the turnover. The agreement provided for an audit if the parties failed to agree. TR issued a figure. I argued that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.410716