Calladine-Smith v Saveorder Ltd: ChD 5 Jul 2011

The Defendant relied on Section 7 of the 1978 Act to support of its contention that it had served on the Claimant a counter-notice under Section 45 Leasehold Reform (Housing and Urban Development) Act 1993 (‘the 1993 Act’). The Claimant contended that Section 7 allowed him to prove on the facts that the counter-notice had not been served on him and that on the facts he had proved that matter on the ordinary balance of probabilities.
[2011] EWHC 2501 (Ch), [2011] 44 EG 108
Interpretation Act 1978 7
England and Wales

Updated: 06 May 2021; Ref: scu.446005