EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL
Constructive dismissal
Polkey deduction
Having concluded in its first Judgment that the Appellants had been unfairly dismissed, the Employment Tribunal erred in its law in failing to have regard to its reasons for reaching that conclusion when deciding, in its second Judgment, that the likelihood of the Appellants being made redundant if a fair redundancy procedure had been adopted was 100% applying the principle in Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1998] AC 344.
Judges:
Sullivan LJ
Citations:
[2012] UKEAT 0600 – 11 – 1511
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471285