There had been a substantial eviction of travellers from Dale Farm. It had attracted widespread coverage by media organisations, among whom, the claimants sought to challenge production orders made by the respondent court for their films.
Held: The judge has the obligation to protect the subject of an application (who, of course, is not before the court) against speculative or unsubstantiated assertion
Judges:
Moses LJ, Eady J
Citations:
[2012] EWHC 1295 (Admin), [2012] 2 Cr App R 33
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Mills and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Sussex Police and Another Admn 25-Jul-2014
The claimants faced criminal charges involving allegations of fraud and corruption. They now challenged by judicial review a search and seizure warrant saying that it was unlawful. A restraint order had been made against them and they had complied . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Police, Media
Updated: 23 May 2022; Ref: scu.459558
