The fact that evidence had been obtained under compulsion was not sufficient reason to prevent its disclosure for other civil matters if the Rule’s requirements were met and it was necessary to achieve fairness or reduction in costs.
Citations:
Times 13-Nov-1998, Gazette 25-Nov-1998
Statutes:
Rules of the Supreme Court Order 24 R 13
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Sullman and Another ChD 19-Dec-2008
An application was made to disqualify as a company director a former director of Claims Direct Limited. He had been accused of several actions which might justify a disqualification.
Held: The court found misconduct but delayed a decision on . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.78606