Site icon swarb.co.uk

British American Tobacco Company Limited v Inland Revenue Commissioners: HL 1943

The House considered whether British American had a ‘controlling interest’ in a subsidiary of its direct subsidiary. The company argued that ‘controlling interest’ equated to beneficial ownership. In rejecting that argument Viscount Simon said: ‘I find it impossible to adopt the view that a person who (by having requisite voting power in a company subject to his will and ordering) can make the ultimate decision as to where and how the business of the company shall be carried on and who thus has, in fact, control of the company’s affairs, is a person of whom it can be said that he has not in this connection got a controlling interest in the company.’

Judges:

Viscount Simon

Citations:

[1943] AC 335, [1943] 1 All ER 13

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

DistinguishedBermuda Cablevision Limited and others v Colica Trust Company Limited PC 6-Oct-1997
(Bermuda) An alternative remedy to winding up is available to a shareholder where oppressive conduct is alleged, though the main thrust is that the conduct is unlawful. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Income Tax

Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.221571

Exit mobile version