Site icon swarb.co.uk

Bristol Cars Ltd v RKH (Hotels) Ltd (In Liquidation): 1979

The tenant had served a s26 notice, but it was invalid in specifying a date too early. Not seeing this, the landlord at first said it would not oppose a new tenancy, and gave no counter-notice and went on to apply for an interim rent. On later seeing the error, the landlord objected.
Held: The landlord’s behaviour created an estoppel. By the time he objected it was too late for the tenant to correct the notice.
[1979] 38 P and CR 411
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 26
England and Wales

Updated: 08 July 2021; Ref: scu.216644 br>

Exit mobile version