cw Proposed amendments to a plaintiff’s pleadings failed to prevent a striking out. The amendments either sought to advance by a different route the earlier claim which was bound to fail, or sought to introduce a new cause of action which was statute barred and did not derive from the same, or substantially the same, facts.
Citations:
[2000] Lloyd’s Rep PN 788
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – Bristol and West Building Society v Baden Barnes and Groves QBD 13-Dec-1996
cw Proposed amendments to a plaintiff’s pleadings were insufficient to prevent a striking out. The amendments either sought to advance by a different route the earlier claim which was bound to fail, or to . .
Cited by:
Cited – Hilton v Barker Booth & Eastwood (a Firm) CA 22-May-2002
The firm of solicitors acted for both parties in a conveyancing transaction, in a situation when they were permitted to do so. The firm had previously acted for one party in a case where he had been convicted of a crime. The other party said the . .
Appealed to – Bristol and West Building Society v Baden Barnes and Groves QBD 13-Dec-1996
cw Proposed amendments to a plaintiff’s pleadings were insufficient to prevent a striking out. The amendments either sought to advance by a different route the earlier claim which was bound to fail, or to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Limitation, Land, Legal Professions, Professional Negligence
Updated: 28 April 2022; Ref: scu.181059
