Site icon swarb.co.uk

Brill v Interactive Business Communications Ltd: CA 9 Dec 2010

The claimant had issued proceedings for unfair dismissal, but his appeal against refusal of permission to amend his claim to allow a claim for disability discrimination had succeeded at the EAT. At the time when the claim had been made, the law allowing claims for associative disability had not been recognised (Attridge).
Held: The employer’s appeal succeeded. The amended claim had no prospect of success and should not be allowed to proceed.

Citations:

[2010] EWCA Civ 1604

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedS. Coleman v Attridge Law, Steve Law ECJ 17-Jul-2008
ECJ Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Articles 1, 2(1), (2)(a) and (3) and 3(1)(c) – Direct discrimination on grounds of disability – Harassment related to . .
CitedLondon Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm HL 25-Jun-2008
Unrelated Detriment was no Discrimination
The tenant had left his flat and sublet it so as to allow the landlord authority an apparently unanswerable claim for possession. The authority appealed a finding that they had to take into account the fact that the tenant was disabled and make . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 03 September 2022; Ref: scu.430486

Exit mobile version