Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Brighton and Hove City Council (Decision Notice): ICO 9 Sep 2009

Citations:

[2009] UKICO FS50247797

Links:

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Information

Updated: 20 May 2022; Ref: scu.532159

Posted on May 20, 2022May 20, 2022 by dlsPosted in InformationTagged Information

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Michael v The Official Receiver: CA 11 Apr 2014

Next Next post: Swatch v OHMI – Panavision Europe (Swatchball): ECFI 19 May 2015

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

The Sunrider Corp v OHIM: ECJ 11 May 2006
Geddes and others: SCS 16 May 2006
Reka v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 16 May 2006
Atwal Enterprises Ltd v Toner (T/A Donal Toner Associates): SCS 12 May 2006
Air One SpA v Commission (State Aid): ECFI 10 May 2006
Commission v Italy C-197/03: ECJ 11 May 2006
Taylor, Re: CA 16 May 2006
R v Commission T-331/04: ECFI 10 May 2006
Roberts and Another v Gable and others: QBD 12 May 2006
Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council: QBD 11 May 2006
Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods BV, trading as Friesland Supply Point Ede v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Noord/kantoor Groningen: ECJ 11 May 2006
Galileo International Technology and Others v Commission: ECFI 10 May 2006
Wright v HSBC Bank Plc: QBD 5 May 2006
Commissioners of Customs and Excise, Attorney General v Federation of Technological Industries and Others: ECJ 11 May 2006
James and Others, Regina v: CACD 12 May 2006
Adealon International Proprietary Ltd v London Borough of Merton: ChD 12 Apr 2006
Majead, Re Application for Judicial Review: SCS 16 May 2006
Carbotermo SpA, Consorzio Alisei v Comune di Busto Arsizio,AGESP SpA: ECJ 11 May 2006
Regina v Neaven: CACD 15 May 2006
Holmden’s Settlement Trusts, Re Holmden’s Settlement, Re: HL 13 Dec 1967
Unison v Jervis: EAT 29 Mar 2006
AH (Scope of S103A Reconsideration) Sudan: IAT 19 Apr 2006
NJ v Essex County Council and Another; In re J (Care: Assessment: Fair Trial); Re J (a child) (care proceedings: fair trial): CA 11 May 2006
Zambia v Meer Care and Desai (A Firm) and others: CA 7 Mar 2006
Mckittrick v Customs and Excise: CANI 9 May 2006
Miklis v The Deputy Prosecuror General of Lithuania: Admn 31 Mar 2006
Stepp v United States of America and Another: Admn 11 May 2006
Card, Regina v: CACD 11 May 2006
Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen: CA 9 May 2006
Houldsworth v Her Majesty’s Advocate: HCJ 14 Mar 2006
Holms and Another v Ashford Estates Ltd: ScSf 14 Feb 2006
RH (Para 289A/Hc395, No Discretion) Bangladesh: IAT 18 Apr 2006
AS (Appeals Raising Articles 3 and 8) Iran: IAT 18 Apr 2006
RM (Kwok on Tong: Hc395 Para 320) India: IAT 18 Apr 2006
SH (Baha’is) Iran CG: IAT 27 Apr 2006
Southern Railway of Peru Ltd v Owen: HL 21 Jun 1956
Tolley v J S Fry and Sons Ltd: HL 1931
Direct Timber Ltd v Hayward: EAT 26 Apr 2006
Brown v Ministry of Defence: CA 10 May 2006
Arora v Rockwell Automation Ltd: EAT 21 Apr 2006
Fletcher and others v NHS Pensions Agency/Student Grants Unit and Another: CA 29 Mar 2006
M, Regina (on the Application of) v Mental Health Review Team: Admn 7 Dec 2005
Secretary of State for the Home Department, Regina (on the Application Of) v Mental Health Review Tribunal and others: Admn 7 Apr 2004
DB, Re Application for Judicial Review: SCS 9 May 2006
Kenmore Homes (UK) Ltd v Cumming: SCS 9 May 2006
Canning v Her Majesty’s Coroner for the County of Northampton: CA 23 Mar 2006
HM Attorney General v Bruce: EAT 12 Apr 2006
British Airways Plc v Noble and Forde: CA 9 May 2006
West Coast Trains Ltd v Murphy: EAT 4 Apr 2006
Whitbread Hotel Co Ltd v Bayley: EAT 3 Apr 2006

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.