Site icon swarb.co.uk

Bright (Executor of Hannah Crisp) v Eynon: 1825

A jury are competent to take cognisance of a fraud disclosed in the evidence before them: and where they had found a verdict without respect to those Circumstances which when reviewed by the Court, appeared clearly to indicate a fraudulent imposition. Held, that a new trial ought to be granted.

[1825] EngR 41, (1825) 2 Keny 53, (1825) 96 ER 1104
Commonlii
England and Wales

Torts – Other

Updated: 01 January 2022; Ref: scu.326132

Exit mobile version