Hudoc ‘. . . in the present case an award of just satisfaction can only be based on the fact that the applicant did not have, before the Austrian courts, the benefit of the guarantees of Article 6(1).’
8658/79, [1985] ECHR 6, (1985) 13 EHRR 409
Worldlii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – Greenfield, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 16-Feb-2005
The appellant had been charged with and disciplined for a prison offence. He was refused legal assistance at his hearing, and it was accepted that the proceedings involved the determination of a criminal charge within the meaning of article 6 of the . .
See Also – Bonisch v Austria ECHR 2-Jun-1986
Hudoc Judgment (Just satisfaction) Pecuniary damage – financial award; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 August 2021; Ref: scu.164942 br>