References: [1851] EngR 878, (1851) 7 Exch 67, (1851) 155 ER 859
Links: Commonlii
The court has power, independently of statute to compel the plaintiff to produce for the defendant’s inspection a document upon which the action is brought, where the defendant is a party to te document and has no copy of it.
This case is cited by:
- See Also – Bluck -v- Gompertz ([1852] EngR 689, Commonlii, (1853) 7 Exch 862, (1852) 155 ER 1199)
The defendant had signed an undertaking to procure the acceptance of two bills for £200 and £146 for wine supplied to an MP and agreed to see that they were duly paid. The latter draft should have been for £150. The plaintiff drew . .