EAT AGE DISCRIMINATION
Appellant made several claims of age discrimination based on the terms of advertisements for jobs for which he did not apply – Claims held to have been rightly struck out/dismissed – Investigo v Keane followed – Reasoning of Cardiff Women’s Aid v Hartup doubted; but even if it was wrong that could not assist the Appellant – Observation that claimants who bring age discrimination claims in respect of allegedly discriminatory job advertisements in which they have no genuine interest purely in the hope of being paid off are liable to face an order for costs.
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 0190 – 10 – 0610
Links:
Employment
Updated: 26 August 2022; Ref: scu.425976