Site icon swarb.co.uk

Bates v Batey and Ld: 1913

References: [1913] 3 KB 351
Coram: Horridge J
The defendants, who manufactured ginger beer, were held not liable to a consumer (who had purchased from a retailer one of their bottles) for injury occasioned by the bottle bursting as the result of a defect of which the defendants did not know, but which by the exercise of reasonable care they could have discovered.
This case is cited by:

Exit mobile version