Site icon swarb.co.uk

Bartram and Sons v Lloyd: 1904

A secret commission had been agreed and paid to the agent. The court was asked whether the principal had elected to affirm the contract with the other party at a later meeting when he was given some information about what had happened.
Held: He had not. The principal had still not made his election with full knowledge of the material facts. There had been an inadequate initial disclosure.

Citations:

[1904] 90 LTR 357

Cited by:

CitedWilson and Another v Hurstanger Ltd CA 4-Apr-2007
The company sought to enforce its loan agreement and charge over the defendants’ property. The defendants appealed saying that the agreement was unenforceable under the Act, since a commission had been paid to the introducing broker, and his fee had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Agency

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.250999

Exit mobile version