The appellant was properly extradited as a convicted person since the conviction, though in his absence was not in contumacy.
Citations:
[1971] AC 282
Cited by:
Cited – Caldarelli v Court of Naples HL 30-Jul-2008
The appellant challenged his extradition saying that the European Arrest Warrant under which he was held wrongly said that he was convicted, whilst he said he was wanted for trial. He had been tried in his absence, and the judgment and sentence were . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Extradition
Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.276451