EAT Practice and Procedure: Review – Rule 40(5) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 – refusal of application for re-instatement of a claim following failure to pay fee or submit fee remission application.
Held: the Employment Judge gave sufficient reasons for her decision, and her decision was not perverse or tainted by any legal error. As to quality of reasons, Neary v Governing Body of St Albans School and Thind v Salvesen Logistics considered. Applications to adduce fresh evidence and amend Notice of Appeal dismissed.
David Richardson HHJ
[2015] UKEAT 0028 – 15 – 1205
Bailii
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 04 January 2022; Ref: scu.552827