Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and others: CA 26 May 2005

The court considered the costs aftermath of a huge claim undertaken on a no win no fee basis and failing. The funder of the claim complained at an award of costs against it.
Held: Those who fund litigation must accept that their risks extend beyond the risk only of bearing their fundee’s costs, and extend to the other party also. However in this case that liability to the successful defendant was to be limited to an amount equal to the sum it had agreed to expend to support the claimant.

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR, Brooke LJ, Dyson LJ
[2005] EWCA Civ 655, Times 03-Jun-2005
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedAiden Shipping Co Ltd v Interbulk Ltd (The ‘Vimeira’) HL 1986
Wide Application of Costs Against Third Party
A claim had been made against charterers by the ship owners, and in turn by the charterers against their sub-charterers. Notice of motion were issued after arbitration awards were not accepted. When heard, costs awards were made, which were now . .
CitedDymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd and others (No. 2) PC 21-Jul-2004
PC (New Zealand) Costs were sought against a non-party, following an earlier determination by the Board.
Held: Jurisdiction to make such an order was not complete. Where the order sought was against a . .
CitedRegina (Factortame Ltd and Others) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No 8) CA 3-Jul-2002
A firm of accountants had agreed to provide their services as experts in a case on the basis that they would be paid by taking part of any damages awarded. The respondent claimed that such an agreement was champertous and unlawful.
Held: The . .
CitedHamilton v Al Fayed and Others (No 2) CA 17-May-2002
The claimant had lost a libel action and been bankrupted. The defendant sought to recover his costs from those who had financially supported the claimant. He now appealed a dismissal of his request for contributions.
Held: An order for the . .
Appeal fromArkin v Borchard Lines Limited, Andzim Israel Navigation Company Ltd and others (No 3) ComC 16-Dec-2003
. .

Cited by:
CitedBE Studios Ltd v Smith and Williamson Ltd ChD 2-Dec-2005
The claimant company had failed in its action. The court was asked to make a costs order personally against the principal director of the claimant who had controlled the litigation and funded it. He responded that no impropriety had been shown on . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Costs

Updated: 16 December 2021; Ref: scu.225283