EAT Sex Discrimination : Direct – The Employment Tribunal did not err in its analysis, reasoning and conclusions when considering the time with effect from which the Claimant began to suffer from a disability consisting of a mental impairment. Properly read, the Tribunal’s Decision did not disclose any error of law.
The Tribunal’s further consequential reasoning and conclusions on the issues of reasonable adjustments, constructive knowledge of the employer and the proportionality of the dismissal of the Appellant as a response to the legitimate aim of administering the First Respondent’s school where she was a Teaching Assistant, were not marred by any legal flaw.
Kerr J
[2016] UKEAT 0334 – 15 – 0804
Bailii
England and Wales
Employment, Discrimination
Leading Case
Updated: 09 November 2021; Ref: scu.562551