Site icon swarb.co.uk

Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corporation and Others v Recoletos Ltd and Others: ComC 24 May 2010

The claimants sought summary judgment in their claims alleging fraud by the several defendants.
Held: Gross J granted leave to the Corporate Defendants to defend only upon terms of (in effect) a payment into court of $40 million.

Judges:

Gross J

Citations:

[2010] EWHC 1134 (Comm)

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

CitedApvodedo Nv v Collins ChD 17-Apr-2008
Henderson J set out the test of whether a case was suitable for summary judgment: ‘It is well established that in order to defeat an application for summary judgment it is enough for the defendant to show a prospect of success which is real in the . .

Cited by:

See AlsoAntonio Gramsci Shipping Corp and Others v Stepanovs ComC 25-Feb-2011
The claimant companies alleged that the defendants had used the claimant’s parent’s companies wrongfully to syphon off money from the claimants by interposing contract between the lcimants and their proper customers. In this action the claimant . .
See AlsoAntonio Gramsci Shipping Corp and Others v Recoletos Ltd and Others ComC 12-Jul-2012
The seventh defendant sought to be excused from the case denying the court’s jurisdiction. He had been a director. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Torts – Other

Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: scu.416130

Exit mobile version