Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Anselme and Others v Commission: ECJ 28 Jun 1979

Citations:

C-255/78, [1979] EUECJ C-255/78

Links:

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 21 May 2022; Ref: scu.132796

Posted on May 22, 2022May 22, 2022 by dlsPosted in European

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Commission v France (Rec 1980,P 2299) (Gr80-Ii 0509) (Judgment): ECJ 10 Jul 1980

Next Next post: Interquell Starke-Chemie v Council and Commission: ECJ 4 Oct 1979

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

SB (Risk, Freetown) Sierra Leone CG: IAT 19 Mar 2003
DH (IFA, Albanian) Kosovo: IAT 6 Mar 2002
EL (Ex-Minor, ELR, Return) Kosovo: IAT 4 Jul 2002
KF (IFA, Blood Feud) Albania: IAT 7 May 2002
(Chechen Return) Russia CG: IAT 2 Apr 2003
MT (Refugee, Communist Party) Iran CG: IAT 3 Mar 2003
DP (Risk, Lissouba Region) Republic of Congo Brazzaville CG: IAT 17 Jul 2002
T (Risk UDPS) Democratic Republic of Congo: IAT 27 Jun 2002
AS (Sufficiency of Protection) Lithuania CG: IAT 19 Jul 2002
GX v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Kosovo): IAT 31 Jul 2002
AA (Persecution “Causing” Public Affection Religion Unmarried) Iraq CG: IAT 17 Mar 2003
KS (Sufficiency of Protection, Sunni Extremists) Sri Lanka: IAT 2 Jan 2003
IM (Article 3, Orthodox Jew, Military Service) Russia CG: IAT 8 Jan 2003
EC (Queue Jumping, Marriage, Apply From Kosovo) Kosovo: IAT 20 Feb 2003
FV (Article 8 Faqs ) Kosovo: IAT 17 Feb 2003
ZG (Catholic, Woman, Kidnapping, Prostitution) Kosovo: IAT 29 Jan 2003
Tanveer Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Pakistan): IAT 19 Feb 2002
LH RQ (Risk, Albanians, Presevo Valley) Serbia and Montenegro CG: IAT 31 Jan 2003
AR (Article 8, Mahmood, Private Life) Kosovo CG: IAT 24 Mar 2003
TT (Risk UDPS) Democratic Republic of Congo: IAT 12 Feb 2003
NR (Gang Warfare, Witness, Risk on Return) Jamaica: IAT 6 Jan 2005
ST (NS Case, Scope of Appeal) Sri Lanka: IAT 19 Jan 2005
As (Risk, Return, Sikh, Separatists) India Cg: IAT 10 Jan 2003
AA (Failed Asylum Seeker) Sudan CG: IAT 7 Jan 2003
AS (Article 3, Kenyan Asian) Kenya Cg: IAT 8 Jan 2003
GG (Return, Eritrean) Ethiopia Cg: IAT 10 Jan 2003
EB (Risk, Return, Ethiopian, Eritrea) Eritrea: IAT 29 Jan 2003
YK and RL ( Kosovo, Risk To Homosexuals) Serbia and Montenegro CG: IAT 19 Jan 2005
IJ (Risk, Midgan) Somalia CG: IAT 29 Jan 2003
FK (Kabul) Afghanistan CG: IAT 15 Jan 2003
Danian v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 28 Oct 1999
Kc (Adjudicator Wrongly Obtaining Post-Hearing Evidence) Turkey: IAT 19 Jan 2005
DC (Interview Through Interpreter, Language Ability) Philippines: IAT 20 Jan 2005
MS (Inability To Make Entry Clearance Application) Somalia: IAT 17 Jan 2005
Abid Hussain v Regina: CACD 19 Jan 2005
(Un-named) – Incapacity Assessment: SSCS 13 Dec 2004
Wagstaff v Colls: SCCO 2 Apr 2003
Norwich City Council v Famuyiwa: CA 21 Dec 2004
Colin Dawson Windows Ltd v Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk, Howard: CA 20 Jan 2005
R Griggs Group Ltd, R Griggs and Co Ltd, Airwair Ltd v Evans, Raben Footwear Pty Ltd, Lewy, Lewy: CA 25 Jan 2005
(Un-named) (DLA): SSCS 30 Nov 2004
Monument v Regina: CACD 21 Jan 2005
(Un-named) (Disability Living Allowance): SSCS 21 Dec 2004
(Un-named) (DLA): SSCS 30 Sep 2004
(Un-named) DLA: SSCS 13 Dec 2004
(Un-named) CIB – 2767 – 2004: SSCS 13 Dec 2004
Belhaven Brewery Company Ltd v Bradbury: SCS 20 Jan 2005
Wood v Chief Constable West Midlands Police: CA 8 Dec 2004
Bradley, Regina v: CACD 14 Jan 2005
Thor Navigation Inc v Ingosstrakh Insurance Company Ltd. and Another: ComC 14 Jan 2005

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.