References: [2006] UKEAT 0152_06_1407
Links: Bailii
Ratio: ECJ Appeal against dismissal of claims of race discrimination and victimisation on grounds of apparent bias/judicial misconduct of ET and perversity/error of law. Appeal on both grounds dismissed. No reason why, consistent with Lodwick, such an appeal could not be disposed of by EAT, after operation, where appropriate, of paragraph 11 of EAT Practice Direction without cross-examination or full, or even preliminary, hearing.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:
- See Also – Ansar v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc and others EAT (Bailii, [2006] UKEAT 0609_05_1407)
EAT Appeal, on basis that Chairman ought to have recused himself from pre-hearing review of a second action, because of outstanding complaints against him of apparent bias/alleged misconduct in respect of an . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 26 March 2017
Ref: 243220