ECJ Appeal against dismissal of claims of race discrimination and victimisation on grounds of apparent bias/judicial misconduct of ET and perversity/error of law. Appeal on both grounds dismissed. No reason why, consistent with Lodwick, such an appeal could not be disposed of by EAT, after operation, where appropriate, of paragraph 11 of EAT Practice Direction without cross-examination or full, or even preliminary, hearing.
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0152 – 06 – 1407
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Ansar v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc and others 0609 – 05 – 1407 EAT 14-Jul-2006
EAT Appeal, on basis that Chairman ought to have recused himself from pre-hearing review of a second action, because of outstanding complaints against him of apparent bias/alleged misconduct in respect of an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 07 July 2022; Ref: scu.243220