The plaintiff had taken the defendant’s daughter in marriage, accepting the latter’s offer to be paid 100 marks for the purpose.
Held: A cause of action was disclosed. Although it was not on a contract, it was so in effect. There had been a quid pro quo. By the espousal, the plaintiff has discharged his part of the bargain, and should now be paid.
Judges:
Danvers and Moyle JJ
Citations:
(1458) YB 37 Hen 6 p8 pl18
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Contract
Updated: 23 November 2022; Ref: scu.183120