Ankerl v Switzerland: ECHR 23 Oct 1996

Hudoc Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); No violation of Art. 6-1; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+6-1
‘the Court’s task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety were ‘fair’ within the meaning of Article 6.1′.
17748/91, [1996] ECHR 45
Worldlii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 6.1
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedHerbert George Snell and others v Robert Young and Co Limited and others CA 21-Nov-2002
The claimants had sought damages for poisoning from organophosphates used in sheep dipping. Evidence linking the injuries to the use of the chemicals had not been found, and the actions struck out as an abuse of process. The group litigation had . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 30 August 2021; Ref: scu.165443