IPO The applicants did not offer observations to meet the examiner’s objection that the product was not protected by the basic patent. Subsequent warnings that failure to reply would result in rejection and an invitation to be heard also failed to illicit a response. Therefore the application for an SPC was rejected.
Judges:
Mr R Walker
Citations:
[2003] UKIntelP o30403, O/304/03
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Intellectual Property
Updated: 16 October 2022; Ref: scu.455713