Site icon swarb.co.uk

Aldrian v Austria: ECHR 1990

(Admissibility) ‘The Commission recalls its constant case-law according to which proceedings concerning the execution of a sentence imposed by a competent court, including proceedings on the grant of conditional release, are not covered by Article 6 para 1 of the Convention. They concern neither the determination of ‘a criminal charge’ nor of ‘civil rights and obligations’ within the meaning of this provision.’

Citations:

(1990) 65 DR 337

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights 6

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Parole Board ex parte Smith, Regina v Parole Board ex parte West (Conjoined Appeals) HL 27-Jan-2005
Each defendant challenged the way he had been treated on revocation of his parole licence, saying he should have been given the opportunity to make oral representations.
Held: The prisoners’ appeals were allowed.
Lord Bingham stated: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 09 May 2022; Ref: scu.222101

Exit mobile version