The claimants sought payment of a bonus for having completed the construction of a vessel on time. They claimed that certificates estopped the defendants from admitting the bonus to be due. The defendants said the certificates had been issued in reliance upon false representations made by the claimants.
Held: The defendant was estopped from denying the validity of the certificates.
Judges:
His Honour Judge Richard Havery Q.C.
Citations:
[2002] EWHC 104 (Technology)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Alfred C Toepfer v Peter Cremer CA 1975
The court was asked as to the effect of a telex sent by the buyers to the sellers, notifying them that if a notice of appropriation was not received by the following day, then the buyers would treat the sellers as being in default, under clause 26 . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract, Estoppel
Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.167529