Site icon swarb.co.uk

Aberdeen Journals Limited v Director General of Fair Trading: CAT 19 Mar 2002

A decision of the Director General was set aside and the matter remitted to the DGFT, with a direction that a new notice under the then relevant rules be issued within 2 months.

Citations:

[2002] CAT 4, 1005/1/1/01

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoAberdeen Journals Limited v Office of Fair Trading (No 2) CAT 2002
Sir Christopher Bellamy said: ‘. . the question whether a certain pricing practice by a dominant undertaking is to be regarded as abusive for the purposes of Chapter II is a matter to be looked at in the round, taking particularly into account (i) . .

Cited by:

CitedOffice of Communications and Another v Floe Telecom Ltd CA 15-Jun-2006
The Competition Appeal Tribunal had remitted a matter to the Office of Fair Trading and had set a time limit for the Commisioner to complete his investigation. The Office appealed.
Held: It was not within the CAT’s power, under either the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Commercial

Updated: 29 August 2022; Ref: scu.227109

Exit mobile version