Site icon swarb.co.uk

AB v Home Office: EAT 29 Aug 2014

EAT Practice and Procedure : Review – The Claimant applied for a review of a judgment. The Employment Judge refused the application on preliminary consideration. The Claimant appealed the refusal to hold a review (he also appealed the judgment itself, but was out of time as regards that appeal).
Held: on careful analysis of the issues and reasons of the Employment Tribunal, it was plain that the Employment Tribunal had decided the issues between the parties and given judgment accordingly. The mere fact that the Employment Tribunals’s reasons could have been improved in one respect was not a sufficient reason for ordering a review where, as here, the Employment Judge was entitled to conclude that there was no reasonable prospect of the judgment being varied or revoked.

David Richardson HHJ
[2014] UKEAT 0363 – 13 – 2908
Bailii
England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 20 December 2021; Ref: scu.536297

Exit mobile version