Click the case name for better results:

Regina v Lam and Others (T/a ‘Namesakes of Torbay’) and Borough of Torbay: CA 30 Jul 1997

The claimant sought damages after the planning authority allowed the first defendant to conduct a manufacturing business in the course of which spraying activities took place which caused them personal injuries and loss of business. Held: The planning system is a regulatory system as envisaged in X (Minors), such that there should be no private … Continue reading Regina v Lam and Others (T/a ‘Namesakes of Torbay’) and Borough of Torbay: CA 30 Jul 1997

Regina (Cherwell District Council) v First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 28 Oct 2004

The applicant sought to develop an asylum centre. Rather than apply for planning permission, it had served a notice of proposed development for the Crown. The Council appealed dismissal of its objections to the use of the procedure. Held: The appeal failed. The Crown was not subject to planning control. The section was to be … Continue reading Regina (Cherwell District Council) v First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 28 Oct 2004

Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999

The fact that a new product was made on agricultural land from produce grown elsewhere on the land did not make that production process non-agricultural. The making of wine is capable of being agricultural use, and being thus free from planning control. The court considered the Secretary of State’s reaction to the judges comments at … Continue reading Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999

Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 10 Nov 2010

Regional Spatial Stategies, setting targets for new homes within regions, and governing planning consents were to be withdrawn by the respondent and replaced in due course by a new planning bill. The claimant objected that this could only be achieved by primary legislation, and that pending such it was wrong to allow the respondent to … Continue reading Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 10 Nov 2010

Dover District Council v CPRE Kent: SC 6 Dec 2017

‘When a local planning authority against the advice of its own professional advisers grants permission for a controversial development, what legal duty, if any, does it have to state the reasons for its decision, and in how much detail? Is such a duty to be found in statutory sources, European or domestic, or in the … Continue reading Dover District Council v CPRE Kent: SC 6 Dec 2017

Fairstate Ltd v First Secretary of State and Another: CA 21 Mar 2005

The company challenged an enforcement notice. It had used premises to provide temporary sleeping accommodation for more than ten years but without a planning consent to change of use. There was a break of five months after the after the first ten year period, whilst it was used as longer term accommodation, but then it … Continue reading Fairstate Ltd v First Secretary of State and Another: CA 21 Mar 2005

Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Another: CA 22 Mar 2000

The court was asked whether the erection of a marquee in the grounds of an hotel amounted to a development requiring planning permission. The hotel was a listed building. The marquee was only taken down once a year. Held: The marquee required permission. Judges: Morritt, Pill, Schiemann LJJ Citations: [2000] EWCA Civ 5569 Links: Bailii … Continue reading Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Another: CA 22 Mar 2000

Staffordshire County Council v Challinor and Another: CA 17 Aug 2007

Judges: Rix LJ, Keene LJ, Hughes LJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Civ 864 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 285(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Staffordshire County Council v Challinor TCC 23-Feb-2007 Request for injunction to restrain breach of enforcement notice. . . See Also – Challinor v Regina CACD … Continue reading Staffordshire County Council v Challinor and Another: CA 17 Aug 2007

Regina v Leominster District Council ex parte Pothecary: CA 28 Oct 1997

A building was erected without planning permission. The local planning authority chose not to serve an enforcement notice but rather had invited an application for retrospective planning permission. Held: The fact that a building has already been constructed before planning permission is sought might lawfully be regarded as a consideration in favour of a permission … Continue reading Regina v Leominster District Council ex parte Pothecary: CA 28 Oct 1997

Lomax and others v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another: Admn 10 May 2002

The authority sought compulsory purchase of land which adjoined a motorway. An agreement was made before the enquiry, but the inspector felt that others who were not represented would also be affected, and recommended rejection of the agreement. The Secretary of State proceeded, after substantial correspondence including with the objectors. The objectors complained that though … Continue reading Lomax and others v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another: Admn 10 May 2002

Francis v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 May 2012

FTTTx VAT – refunds to DIY builders – s 35 VAT Act 1994 – original planning permission replaced – whether replacement permission retrospective to date of works – s 73A Town and Country Planning Act 1990 – appeal allowed Citations: [2012] UKFTT 359 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 03 November 2022; … Continue reading Francis v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 May 2012

William Boyer (Transport) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another: CA 7 Feb 1996

Renewed enforcement notices still had to be issued within a ten year period. A previous enforcement action taken by authority, needed itself to have been valid if it was to be used as a basis for keeping time running. ‘The breach of planning control alleged by the ‘second bite’ enforcement notice under section 171B(4) has … Continue reading William Boyer (Transport) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another: CA 7 Feb 1996

Silver v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 1 Aug 2014

The claimant sought to have quashed an inspector’s decision not to grant retrospective planning permission for an extesion built to his property. Judges: Supperstone J Citations: [2014] EWHC 2729 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 288 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 16 October 2022; Ref: scu.535540

Sage v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Another: CA 28 Jun 2001

Question of the proper approach at law to the question of what amounts to ‘substantial completion’ of operations within the enforcement provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Citations: [2001] EWCA Civ 1100, [2002] JPL 352, [2001] 3 PLR 107, [2002] 1 P and CR 38, [2001] 27 EGCS 133 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Sage v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Another: CA 28 Jun 2001

Wright and Another v Horsham District Council: UTLC 22 Aug 2011

UTLC COMPENSATION – tree preservation order – cracks appearing in house – refusal of consent to fell three oak trees – claim for cost of underpinning works, distress and inconvenience – whether damage caused by tree roots – whether evidence produced after refusal of consent admissible in determining causation – whether underpinning the natural and … Continue reading Wright and Another v Horsham District Council: UTLC 22 Aug 2011

Millgate Development Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Wokingham Borough Council: CA 6 Jul 2011

The developer appealed against refusal of an order releasing it from undertakings given to the local authority under section 106. Judges: Pill, Rimer, Munby LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 1062 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 20 September 2022; Ref: scu.444598

Wright, Regina (on The Application of) v Forest of Dean District Council Resilient Energy Serverndale Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2017

Permission for the change of use of land to allow erection of a wind turbine had been quashed on the basis that the LA had taken account of an irrelevant matter, namely the proposed financial contributions from the development to the local community. Held: The appeal failed.Davis LJ gave a short concurring judgment to emphasise … Continue reading Wright, Regina (on The Application of) v Forest of Dean District Council Resilient Energy Serverndale Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2017

Wright, Regina (on The Application of) v Forest of Dean District Council and Another: Admn 9 Jun 2016

The court was asked whether or not an element of the package of socio-economic benefits associated with a wind turbine development, in the form of a local community donation based on turnover generated by the wind turbine, amounts to a material consideration which it was lawful for the defendant to take into account when granting … Continue reading Wright, Regina (on The Application of) v Forest of Dean District Council and Another: Admn 9 Jun 2016

Millgate Developments Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Wokingham Borough Council: Admn 14 Jan 2011

The claimant sought judicial review of the defendants refusal to release it from a unilateral undertaking they had given. Judges: David Pearl J Citations: [2011] EWHC 6 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 31 August 2022; Ref: scu.428075

Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council v Windy Bank Dairy Farm Ltd and Another: Admn 12 Nov 2010

The Council appealed against decision of the Magistrates Court rejecting its claim of the breach of planning law by the placing of motor vehicles on the respondent’s land. Judges: Munby LJ, Langstaff J Citations: [2010] EWHC 2929 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: e Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007 SI 2007/783 4, … Continue reading Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council v Windy Bank Dairy Farm Ltd and Another: Admn 12 Nov 2010

Lancaster-Thomas v Teignbridge District Council: LT 18 Jun 2007

LT COMPENSATION – planning permission – refusal of planning permission formerly granted by development order – inability to construct a stock proof fence – whether depreciation in the value of the claimant’s freehold interest – nil compensation awarded – Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ssl07 and 108 – Town and Country Planning (General Permitted … Continue reading Lancaster-Thomas v Teignbridge District Council: LT 18 Jun 2007

The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council and Victoria Hall Ltd: CA 30 Jul 2010

The Council had granted planning pemission for four blocks of student accomodation. The Executive objected that it had not dealt properly with the issue the proximity of a liquified petroleum gas storage depot. Held: Though there had been some confusion as to the need to revoke all or part only of the consent, the council’s … Continue reading The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council and Victoria Hall Ltd: CA 30 Jul 2010

Hampshire County Council v Beazer Homes Ltd: QBD 29 Nov 2010

Claim for a declaration as to the meaning of an agreement made under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Judges: Swift J DBE Citations: [2010] EWHC 3095 (QB), [2011] PTSR D8 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: … Continue reading Hampshire County Council v Beazer Homes Ltd: QBD 29 Nov 2010

Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: CA 29 Jan 2010

The land owner had received planning consent to erect a barn. Instead he constructed a house, but disguised it. Held: The appeal succeeded. Once the house had been used as such for four years, the authority was obliged to issue the certificate of lawful use even though the house had been built under a deception. … Continue reading Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: CA 29 Jan 2010

Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council and Another: Admn 5 Nov 2009

The claimant sought to have development stopped on a site which it said was too near a site for the storage of liquid petroleum gas. Held: Collins J allowed the claim and granted declaratory relief that Wolverhampton had failed to: (i) notify the HSE that it was minded to grant permission; (ii) notify the HSE … Continue reading Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council and Another: Admn 5 Nov 2009

The London Borough of Barnet v Secretary of State for the Home Department, McCarthy and Stone (Developments) Ltd: Admn 23 Aug 2001

The applicant sought to quash a decision letter. It had wanted to create a development, but the local authority considered it had not met the requirement to include affordable housing. It was agreed that a need existed for affordable housing, and the Inspector considered the development large enough to be required to make provision. The … Continue reading The London Borough of Barnet v Secretary of State for the Home Department, McCarthy and Stone (Developments) Ltd: Admn 23 Aug 2001

Regina v Westminster City Council, ex parte Monahan: CA 1989

The Royal Opera House sought permission and listed building consents to carry out a re-development, extending and modernising the House raising it to international standards, and to develop the surrounding area consistently with that project. Parts of the site were proposed to be used for the erection of office accommodation, which would be a departure … Continue reading Regina v Westminster City Council, ex parte Monahan: CA 1989

Everett v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions, and Another: Admn 3 Sep 2001

The applicant had erected various buildings without permission. At one point, one of two enforcement notices was set aside on the basis that the use had been established for more than four years. Subsequently, buildings were demolished and rebuilt. He answered a further enforcement notice saying that the use had been lawful by virtue of … Continue reading Everett v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions, and Another: Admn 3 Sep 2001

Perrin and Another v Northampton Borough Council and others: CA 19 Dec 2007

The land owners had sought permission to fell an oak tree subject to a tree preservation order in order to prevent further damage from its roots. Held: The council’s appeal succeeded. The court was asked to decide whether any works to the tree could be said to be necessary if there were other possible works … Continue reading Perrin and Another v Northampton Borough Council and others: CA 19 Dec 2007

Lisa Smith, Regina (on the Application of) v South Norfolk Council: Admn 10 Nov 2006

The claimant gypsies had bought and moved onto land in Norfolk and stayed there in breach of planning enforcement notices. The inspector upheld the notices, but advised the Council of the difficulties in finding sites and had stayed enforcement for a year. The claimants now said that it was unlawful of the council to use … Continue reading Lisa Smith, Regina (on the Application of) v South Norfolk Council: Admn 10 Nov 2006

First Secretary of State v Arun District Council and Another: CA 10 Aug 2006

The land-owner had received planning permission to construct an extension to her home subject to a condition that it could be occupied only by a dependant relative. In 1996, she let it to students in breach of the condition. In 1996, te council took enforcement proceedings. She answered that the time limit for enforcement was … Continue reading First Secretary of State v Arun District Council and Another: CA 10 Aug 2006

Wilson v Wychavon District Council and Another: Admn 20 Dec 2005

The claimant complained that the law which protected an occupier of a dwelling house from a temporary stop notice did not apply to those living in caravans, and that this was discriminatory. Held: The claim failed. ‘usually a change of use of a building to a dwelling will cause less immediate environmental damage than the … Continue reading Wilson v Wychavon District Council and Another: Admn 20 Dec 2005

Beazer Homes Ltd v Stroude: CA 17 Mar 2005

Mr S asserted a right as against the builders under a section 106 agreement. The builder said that evidence of what had occurred as a background to the agreement should be admitted. The parties had requested the judge to decide as a preliminary issue on the admissibility of that evidence. Held: It was rarely wise … Continue reading Beazer Homes Ltd v Stroude: CA 17 Mar 2005

Clear Channel United Kingdom Ltd, Regina (on the Application of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 14 Oct 2004

The claimant sought a declaration that it had a tenancy for its occupation by an advertising station, and that it had protection under the 1954 Act. The defendant council said that only a licence had been granted. Held: The grants included the areas surrounding the concrete bases on which the stations were erected. Despite the … Continue reading Clear Channel United Kingdom Ltd, Regina (on the Application of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 14 Oct 2004

Doncaster Borough Council v Green and Others: CA 15 Jan 1992

An injunction is not available to enforce a stop notice whilst an appeal was pending. The court may not use its own inherent powers to fill an apparent gap in legislation. The planning code was intended to be comprehensive. Citations: Gazette 15-Jan-1992 Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 183(1), (3)(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Doncaster Borough Council v Green and Others: CA 15 Jan 1992

International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council: CA 26 Feb 2004

The council served a stop notice. The company sought compensation. The council replied that the company had no legal or equitable interest in the land affected. Held: The company had occupied the land under a licence. A contractual licensee on land may be, but is not necessarily, an occupier. Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 288, Times … Continue reading International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council: CA 26 Feb 2004

Jones, Regina (on the Application of) v Mansfield District Council and Another: CA 16 Oct 2003

Plannning permission was sought. Objectors said that it would have such an impact that an environmental impact assessment was required. They now sought judicial review of the decision to proceed without one. Held: The judge had explained the approach correctly, and the role of the court is to conduct a Wednesbury review of the decision … Continue reading Jones, Regina (on the Application of) v Mansfield District Council and Another: CA 16 Oct 2003

Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and others: HL 10 Apr 2003

The appellant had challenged an enforcement notice requiring him to pull down a partially built house. The issue was when the four year limitation period had commenced. Did the four year limitation period commence when the works were complete, or when the building was complete? Held: The inspector had found the building to be a … Continue reading Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and others: HL 10 Apr 2003

Regina (on the Application of Kides) v South Cambridgeshire District Council Ltd: CA 9 Oct 2002

The applicant sought a judicial review of a grant of planning permission. She said that in the considerable time gap between the decision in principle, and the decision notice, several elements had changed requiring the decision to be reconsidered. Held: Review was refused. The section required the authority to have regard to all material considerations … Continue reading Regina (on the Application of Kides) v South Cambridgeshire District Council Ltd: CA 9 Oct 2002

Rugby Football Union v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: CA 17 Jul 2002

The land owner sought a certificate of lawful use for its Rugby Stadium which had been used as a concert stadium. Held: The court must look to the Order to see whether the proposed use fell within the same use class as the existing use. A sports stadium use was class D2(e), but a concert … Continue reading Rugby Football Union v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: CA 17 Jul 2002

Adlard and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Fulham Stadium Ltd: CA 17 May 2002

The landowners sought permission to redevelop their football stadium. The authority were minded to grant the permission, and after an enquiry, permission was granted, but in the meantime another permission was proposed for a larger stadium. This was not called in, depriving the applicants of their opportunity to make their objections, and did not give … Continue reading Adlard and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Fulham Stadium Ltd: CA 17 May 2002

Welwyn Hatfield Council, Regina (On the Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 7 Apr 2009

The council appealed against the decision of the inspector that the land-owner should be granted a certificate of lawful development. Held: Collins J over-turned the inspector’s decision. He viewed the building as the permitted barn, but went on to hold that there had never been any intention to use the building other than as a … Continue reading Welwyn Hatfield Council, Regina (On the Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 7 Apr 2009

J S Bloor Ltd and Another v Swindon Borough Council and Others: Admn 23 Nov 2001

Whether a planning policy was a general one to be included in the structure plan, or a detailed one to be included in the local plan, was a matter of judgement by the local authority, provided only that it directed itself correctly as to the meaning of ‘general policies’ as set down in statute and … Continue reading J S Bloor Ltd and Another v Swindon Borough Council and Others: Admn 23 Nov 2001

Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions and Another v Wyatt Brothers (Oxford) Ltd: CA 26 Oct 2001

The applicants were granted permission to construct a golf course and other facilities. They were then served with enforcement notices requiring them to remove waste materials deposited on the site. They appealed contending that the notices went beyond that required to comply with the planning permission. Held: It was proper for the notices to require … Continue reading Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions and Another v Wyatt Brothers (Oxford) Ltd: CA 26 Oct 2001

Porter, Searle and Others, Berry and Harty v South Buckinghamshire District Council, Chichester District Council, Wrexham County Borough Council, Hertsmere Borough Councilt: CA 12 Oct 2001

Local authorities had obtained injunctions preventing the defendants from taking up occupation, where they had acquired land with a view to living on the plots in mobile homes, but where planning permission had been refused. The various defendants appealed on the basis that the authorities had failed to make proper allowance for their human rights. … Continue reading Porter, Searle and Others, Berry and Harty v South Buckinghamshire District Council, Chichester District Council, Wrexham County Borough Council, Hertsmere Borough Councilt: CA 12 Oct 2001

Berkeley v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames: CA 29 Jun 2001

There is no obligation to refer every application to the Secretary of State where an objector raised a plausible argument that an environmental impact assessment might be needed. In this case the application did not fall within Schedule I, and nor was it in a sensitive area, and nor was it over 0.5 hectares, and … Continue reading Berkeley v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames: CA 29 Jun 2001

Newark and Sherwood District Council v The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Others: QBD 19 Jul 2018

statutory review pursuant to s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 in respect of the Decision Letter dated 23 January 2018 of the first defendant Secretary of State’s Inspector, Mr Brendan Lyons. By that decision he allowed the appeal of the second and third defendants, Dr and Mrs Parsons, against the claimant council’s … Continue reading Newark and Sherwood District Council v The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and Others: QBD 19 Jul 2018

Regina v Bedfordshire County Council ex parte Henlow Grange Health Farm Ltd: Admn 13 Mar 2001

The applicant owned a health farm. Permission was sought to develop adjoining land, and the applicant objected unsuccessfully, but the Secretary of State then called in the decision. In the meantime, the applicant sought judicial review of the council’s decision, saying that the council had given weight to an irrelevant matter. The application failed. The … Continue reading Regina v Bedfordshire County Council ex parte Henlow Grange Health Farm Ltd: Admn 13 Mar 2001

Regina (Holding and Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions; Regina (Premier Leisure UK Limited) v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions; Regina (Alconbury) etc: Admn 13 Dec 2000

The court was asked whether the processes by which the Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions (SSETR) makes decisions under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA) and orders under the Transport and Works Act 1992 (TWA), the Highways Act 1980 (HA) and the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 (ALA) … Continue reading Regina (Holding and Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions; Regina (Premier Leisure UK Limited) v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions; Regina (Alconbury) etc: Admn 13 Dec 2000

Wiggins v Secretary of State for The Environment, Transport and The Regions: Admn 21 Dec 2000

The claimant sought to appeal an enforcement notice. The land had been used for crushing etc concrete. The council had said it was an unlicensed waste management facility. A temporary permission had been granted subject to an obligation under s106. Held: Permission was obtained for a filetring media plant, but under the subsequent Use Classes … Continue reading Wiggins v Secretary of State for The Environment, Transport and The Regions: Admn 21 Dec 2000

Buckinghamshire County Council v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Brown: Admn 31 Aug 2000

The principal shareholder and managing director of a company which was the sole tenant of a building was competent to object to a planning enforcement notice. The corporate veil was not to be set aside except in special circumstances, and in this case the company was no mere sham or front. However, the managing director … Continue reading Buckinghamshire County Council v Secretary of State for Environment, Transport and Regions and Brown: Admn 31 Aug 2000

Alan Frank Sage v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions and Maidstone Borough Council: Admn 11 Oct 2000

An enforcement notice was issued. The land-owner resisted, saying that the building had been substantially completed more than four years before. Held: It was necessary only that the building works permitted by the permission should be complete, and not that the building should be complete in other ways so as to have made it habitable. … Continue reading Alan Frank Sage v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions and Maidstone Borough Council: Admn 11 Oct 2000

Braithwaite and Another v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council: Admn 17 Mar 2000

The claimants owned land designated as green belt. They sought its exclusion from the green belt and designation for employment purposes. At the enquiry, the inspector agreed, and recommended accordingly. The council took the land from the green belt, but allocated it within the UDP as open space. They refused to re-open the enquiry. Held: … Continue reading Braithwaite and Another v Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council: Admn 17 Mar 2000

Head v Eastbourne Borough Council: UTLC 22 Dec 2009

UTLC BLIGHT NOTICE – maisonette – blighted land – appropriate authority’s intention not to acquire any part of hereditament – reasonable endeavours to sell – unable to sell unless at substantially reduced price – claimant’s failure to comply with prescribed form – objections not upheld – blight notice valid – Town and Country Planning Act … Continue reading Head v Eastbourne Borough Council: UTLC 22 Dec 2009

T A J Moore v The Secretary of State for the Environment, The New Forest District Council: Admn 25 Oct 1996

The applicant sought to quash an enforcement notice, regarding a change of use from residential to mixed residential and holiday accommodation. The change had taken in respect of several units over a long period of time. The inspector sought to bring them together and by treating them as one unit, he brought the development within … Continue reading T A J Moore v The Secretary of State for the Environment, The New Forest District Council: Admn 25 Oct 1996

Thurrock Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Enviroment, Transport and The Regions ex parte Terry Holding: CA 13 Dec 2000

Where the claimant was not out of time to bring an appeal, or he retained the right of appeal, or the works proposed involved were not new, and no amendment or substitute of a new claim was proposed, the court should exercise its discretion to amend the claim form so that an application for permission … Continue reading Thurrock Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Enviroment, Transport and The Regions ex parte Terry Holding: CA 13 Dec 2000

Berkeley v Secretary of State For The Environment and Others: HL 11 May 2000

The claimant challenged the grant of planning permission for a new football ground for Fulham Football club, saying that an Environmental Impact Assessment had not been obtained, but was required. Held: Where a planning application if completed would have a substantial effect on the environment, and an environmental impact assessment should have been first obtained, … Continue reading Berkeley v Secretary of State For The Environment and Others: HL 11 May 2000

Bridgnorth District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 12 Jul 2005

Following a complaint from a third party, the Council carried out an investigation into the state of a piece of land owned by the complainant to determine whether any enforcement action was appropriate under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (T and CP Act). The owner of the land requested the right to inspect … Continue reading Bridgnorth District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 12 Jul 2005

Moore v Secretary of State for Environment and New Forest District Council: CA 18 Feb 1998

The outbuildings of a large country house had been converted into ten single self-contained units of residential accommodation for the purpose of holiday lettings. Nine of the units were in use by May 1991. In May 1995 the local planning authority issued an enforcement notice alleging a material change of use from residential to mixed … Continue reading Moore v Secretary of State for Environment and New Forest District Council: CA 18 Feb 1998

J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v South Gloucestershire District Council and Others: CA 29 Mar 2001

Where there was an agreement between an applicant and the planning authority under section 106 of the new Act, with respect the undertaking of work in return for the grant of planning permission, there was no requirement for there to be a direct link between the development and the works. If the agreement was entered … Continue reading J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v South Gloucestershire District Council and Others: CA 29 Mar 2001

Croyden London Borough Council v Gladden and Others: CA 23 Feb 1994

The court could properly grant an interlocutory injunction ordering the removal of a plane (a replica Spitfire) from a roof in breach of planning controls under the Act. Citations: Times 23-Feb-1994, Ind Summary 28-Feb-1994, Gazette 27-Apr-1994, [1994] 1 PLR 30 Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 55(2)(d) 90 187(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited … Continue reading Croyden London Borough Council v Gladden and Others: CA 23 Feb 1994

British Railways Board v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another: HL 29 Oct 1993

Permission had been given for residential development of land provided that access was provided. The access specified was to be over land owned by the council. It was known that the Council would not allow such access. The land owner sought an order that the permission should stand but without the condition. The Secretary had … Continue reading British Railways Board v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another: HL 29 Oct 1993

Bracken v East Hertfordshire District Council: QBD 11 May 2000

An enforcement notice was served on the land owner alleging change of use from agricultural to the storage of building materials and waste and agriculture. The plan incorrectly included the applicant’s house. The applicant challenged the enforcement notice, but failed before the magistrates and on a case stated. The error did not mean that the … Continue reading Bracken v East Hertfordshire District Council: QBD 11 May 2000

Anscomb v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions: QBD 22 Feb 2001

The claimant sought to object to an inspector’s decision to allow erection of a telecommunications mast. The failure of the inspector to consider potential health risks was not open to criticism because the claimant’s papers had made no reference to such risks. A technical report which might have been considered had not been submitted, and … Continue reading Anscomb v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and the Regions: QBD 22 Feb 2001

Allied London Property Investment Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another: QBD 8 Mar 1996

The applicant appealed the dismissal by the respondent of their application to the council for an extension of the time allowed for approval of reserved matters. Held: The appeal was granted. The reason for the delay had been a lack of interest in the proposed development, but when an application was made under the section, … Continue reading Allied London Property Investment Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another: QBD 8 Mar 1996

Alnwick District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: QBD 8 Sep 1999

Where a grant of permission had been reversed, leaving the planning authority liable to pay substantial compensation, such compensation could not be taken account of when reversing the permission. Financial consequences were only a material consideration when they related to the use and development of the land itself. In this case the compensation was not … Continue reading Alnwick District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: QBD 8 Sep 1999

Van Dyck v Secretary of State for the Environment: CA 1993

The court asked whether the four year enforcement rule applied in respect of subdivision of a larger building to create single dwelling houses or applied only in the case of conversion of a single building to single dwelling houses. Held: It applies to subdivision. The concept of the planning unit has no part to play … Continue reading Van Dyck v Secretary of State for the Environment: CA 1993

Epping Forest District Council v Philcox: CA 13 Apr 2000

Where an activity had been continuing without planning permission for 10 years it was no obstacle to obtaining a certificate of lawful use that the activity had been illegal because it had been carried out without a waste management licence. A certificate once granted is conclusive answer to any enforcement notice subsequently issued and is … Continue reading Epping Forest District Council v Philcox: CA 13 Apr 2000

Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment: HL 1980

Issues arose as to a new planning permission for two existing hangars. Held: The appeal succeeded. The question of the validity of conditions attached to planning permissions will sometimes be a difficult one. To be valid, a condition must be imposed for a planning purpose and not for an ulterior one; it must fairly and … Continue reading Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment: HL 1980

Rugby Football Union v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: QBD 25 Oct 2001

The owners of a rugby football stadium were not entitled to a certificate of lawfulness of a proposed use under the section, for the use of the stadium as an open air concert hall. The idea of a concert hall required the idea that it should be a closed area. Nor were attendees at such … Continue reading Rugby Football Union v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: QBD 25 Oct 2001

Tandridge District Council v Verrechia: CA 16 Jun 1999

Where an enforcement notice did not include any required steps, s173(11) does not apply, and an inspector has no power under s176(1) to amend the notice by adding steps to be taken where the issuing local authority could not itself have included it. Citations: Times 16-Jun-1999, Gazette 16-Jun-1999, [1999] 3 All ER 247 Statutes: Town … Continue reading Tandridge District Council v Verrechia: CA 16 Jun 1999

Regina v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte Bath, and North East Somerset District Council: CA 3 Jun 1999

A finding by the local planning authority that applications for listed buildings consent and planning permission were invalid, was not sufficient to exclude the right of the applicant to appeal to the Secretary of State against that finding of validity. This was in accordance with the broad purposes of the planning legislation despite apparently inconsistent … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte Bath, and North East Somerset District Council: CA 3 Jun 1999

Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Secretary of State for et Environment Transport and the Regions and Another: CA 14 Mar 2000

An Act might include a power to amend another by secondary legislation, but any such power must be construed narrowly. The owners of property sought to change its use from long term residential use to a use for short term visitors. S25 of the main Act remained unaffected by subsequent secondary legislation. Citations: Times 14-Mar-2000 … Continue reading Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Secretary of State for et Environment Transport and the Regions and Another: CA 14 Mar 2000

Wright, Regina (on The Application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Another: SC 20 Nov 2019

W challenged the grant of planning permission for the change of use of agricultural land to allow erection of a wind turbine, saying that the authority had taken into account a promise by the land owner to run the scheme as a community development contributing funds locally, and that such was not capable of being … Continue reading Wright, Regina (on The Application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Another: SC 20 Nov 2019

Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc: HL 31 Oct 1984

The House was asked whether the 1971 Act permitted the relevant authorities, by resort to their development plans, to support the retention of traditional industries or was the ambit of the Act such as to permit only ‘land use’ aims to be pursued? The court considered also the relevance of personal considerations in planning matters. … Continue reading Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc: HL 31 Oct 1984

Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and another v Thurrock Borough Council: CA 27 Feb 2002

Land on a farm had been used intermittently for many years as an airfield. The local authority issued two enforcement notices, one in respect of a building used as a hangar, and one for unlawful change of use from domestic and agricultural purposes to use for domestic purposes and as an airfield. The inspector allowed … Continue reading Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and another v Thurrock Borough Council: CA 27 Feb 2002

Regina v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, Ex parte Central Electricity Generating Board: CA 1982

The CEGB wanted to undertake a survey using its statutory powers to check whether land might be suitable for a nuclear power station, and wanted the police to prevent demonstrators from preventing the survey. It now requested an order of mandamus to oblige the chief constable to provide the level of support requested. Held: The … Continue reading Regina v Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, Ex parte Central Electricity Generating Board: CA 1982

Hammerton, Regina (on the Application of) v London Underground Ltd: Admn 8 Nov 2002

Planning permissions had been deemed to have been granted for the construction of the East London Line Extension to Dalston. It was proposed to demolish an historic goods yard with associated buildings to make way for the line. The claimant objected that the new line could be constructed to make good use of mucjh of … Continue reading Hammerton, Regina (on the Application of) v London Underground Ltd: Admn 8 Nov 2002

Regina v Exeter City Council, ex parte JL Thomas Co Ltd: 1990

A challenge was made to a decision of the local authority to grant planning permission for an area of land for residential development where it was surrounded by industrial works. It had no intention to arrange compulsory purchase. Held: The request for judicial review failed. The fact that the authority did not intend to use … Continue reading Regina v Exeter City Council, ex parte JL Thomas Co Ltd: 1990

London Residuary Body v Lambeth London Borough Council: HL 1990

Planning battles had raged over the use of the former GLC County Hall. The question was whether it was desirable and appropriate to retain use of part of the building for London Government offices and centred on the ‘competing needs’ test. Held: County Hall in London was not an office use, but was a Local … Continue reading London Residuary Body v Lambeth London Borough Council: HL 1990

Harrods Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: CA 7 Mar 2002

The applicant sought to allow the roof of its store to be used as a helicopter landing pad, and sought a lawful use certificate. It asserted that such a use was incidental to its main normal use. The secretary of state refused a certificate, against the inspector’s advice, saying that such a use was not … Continue reading Harrods Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another: CA 7 Mar 2002

London Borough of Enfield v Persons Unknown and Others: QBD 2 Oct 2020

The council had obtained interim and final injunctions in 2017 against anticipated trespassers on its land and the order was due to expire. It now ought its extension and to amend the terms of the order. Held: The court noted that no person had yet been served with any documents, and that the legal landscape … Continue reading London Borough of Enfield v Persons Unknown and Others: QBD 2 Oct 2020