Click the case name for better results:

Clear Channel United Kingdom Ltd, Regina (on the Application of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 14 Oct 2004

The claimant sought a declaration that it had a tenancy for its occupation by an advertising station, and that it had protection under the 1954 Act. The defendant council said that only a licence had been granted. Held: The grants included the areas surrounding the concrete bases on which the stations were erected. Despite the … Continue reading Clear Channel United Kingdom Ltd, Regina (on the Application of) v First Secretary of State and Another: Admn 14 Oct 2004

Wandsworth Borough Council v South Western Magistrates’ Court, Clear Channel UK Limited: Admn 2 May 2007

The council appealed dismissal of its prosecution of the defendant under the Regulations on the basis that the defendant had deemed consent for the advertisements at issue. A picture which had been painted on the upper half of a house, in 1921, and had been replaced in 200 with a rolling illuminated advert. The prosecutor … Continue reading Wandsworth Borough Council v South Western Magistrates’ Court, Clear Channel UK Limited: Admn 2 May 2007

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Harvey Nichols and others: CA 4 May 2001

Appeal by the second defendant from a decision granting an injunction (a) restraining the defendants from causing, suffering, permitting or assisting in the display of advertisements other than in compliance with the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1992 (‘the 1992 Regulations’), and (b) that the first two defendants permanently remove from the … Continue reading Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Harvey Nichols and others: CA 4 May 2001

Westminster City Council v Moran: Admn 12 Jun 1998

An advertisement which was displayed regularly enough could come to be displayed continually. Advertisement board nearly always placed on highway outside public house. Parliament had intended clear difference between continually and continuously Citations: Times 14-Oct-1998, [1998] EWHC Admin 637 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1992 (1992 No 666) Planning … Continue reading Westminster City Council v Moran: Admn 12 Jun 1998

O’Brien v Croydon London Borough Council: QBD 27 Jul 1998

A notice requiring discontinuance of an advertisement should be served on the company whose products were being advertised as the advertiser as well as the owner of the site. Failure to do so did not however vitiate prosecution where no prejudice was suffered. Citations: Times 27-Jul-1998 Statutes: Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations … Continue reading O’Brien v Croydon London Borough Council: QBD 27 Jul 1998

Hertsmere Borough Council v Reid Estates Ltd: QBD 22 Jun 2000

The authority gave permission for a road-side sign on condition that it was kept clean and tidy. They later issued a notice requiring its removal, complaining that it had become overgrown and partly obscured. The sign and site were tidied, but the authority prosecuted. They appealed the magistrates dismissal of the information. On appeal the … Continue reading Hertsmere Borough Council v Reid Estates Ltd: QBD 22 Jun 2000

London Borough of Wandsworth v Mills and Allen Ltd and Another: Admn 5 Sep 1997

The Council sought orders to restrain the defendants from using certain land for the display of advertisements. Moriarty QC [1997] EWHC Admin 800 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 187B, Local Government Act 1972 222, Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1992 England and Wales Planning Updated: 03 January 2022; Ref: scu.137745