An aggravated vehicle taking indictment must specify which offence is being prosecuted. Citations: Times 21-Oct-1994, Gazette 11-Jan-1995, Ind Summary 21-Nov-1994 Statutes: Theft Act 1968 12A(2)(b) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.86261
The defendant appealed against her conviction for aggravated vehicle taking. She was found near the scene of a road traffic accident involving a stolen car, and her fingerprint on an inside rear window. She submitted that the officers had asked as to her involvement at a time when she was already a suspect, and that … Continue reading Hughes v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 12 Oct 2009
Offender is arrested when detained by automatic locking car trap. Citations: Times 02-Mar-1994 Statutes: Theft Act 1968 12A(2)(d) Crime Updated: 19 May 2022; Ref: scu.79836
Damage caused after the taking of a car need not be at the fault of the driver defendant for the offence of aggravated vehicle taking to have been committed by him. The sole requirement of the subsection was that the driving of the vehicle should have been the cause of the accident.It was not legitimate … Continue reading Regina v Marsh: CACD 19 Jul 1996
No Liability Extension on Taking Without Consent Appeal by leave of the Court of Appeal on a point of law arising in the course of the trial of the appellant for aggravated vehicle taking, contrary to section 12A of the Theft Act 1968. The defendant had taken a vehicle without the owner’s consent, was over … Continue reading Taylor, Regina v: SC 3 Feb 2016
The offence of causing death by driving while unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured, is committed if the driver is unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured and if the driving is a cause of death in the sense that it was ‘more than negligible or de minimis’. It was not an element of the offence that the defendant’s driving … Continue reading Williams, Regina v: CACD 2 Nov 2010
The defendants were to be tried for allegedly sending funds abroad to support terrorism. The court now considered the meaning of the phrase ‘reasonable cause to suspect’ in the context of the anticipated use of the funds: ‘Does it mean that the accused must actually suspect, and for reasonable cause, that the money may be … Continue reading Lane and Another, Regina v: SC 11 Jul 2018
Judges: Pitchford LJ, Sweeney J and HHJ Bourne-Arton Citations: [2014] EWCA Crim 829 Statutes: Theft Act 1968 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Hughes, Regina v SC 31-Jul-2013 Uninsured Driver Not Guilty of Causing DeathThe appellant though an uninsured driver, was driving without fault when another vehicle veered across the road. The other driver … Continue reading Taylor, Regina v: CACD 9 Apr 2014
Mens Rea essential element of statutory Offence The appellant had been convicted under the Act 1965 of having been concerned in the management of premises used for smoking cannabis. This was a farmhouse which she visited infrequently. The prosecutor had conceded that she was unaware that the premises were used for that purpose. Held: The … Continue reading Sweet v Parsley: HL 23 Jan 1969
Uninsured Driver Not Guilty of Causing Death The appellant though an uninsured driver, was driving without fault when another vehicle veered across the road. The other driver died from his injuries, and the appellant convicted of causing his death whilst uninsured. At trial he succeeded in arguing that he had not caused the death, but … Continue reading Hughes, Regina v: SC 31 Jul 2013
Honest and Reasonable mistake – No Bigamy The defendant appealed against her conviction for bigamy, saying that she had acted in a mistaken belief. Held: A man commits bigamy if he goes through a marriage ceremony while his wife is alive, even though he honestly and reasonably believes she is dead. ‘At common law an … Continue reading Regina v Tolson: CCR 11 May 1889
Mens Rea essential to crime In order to constitute an act of bankruptcy by a trader in departing from his dwelling-house, it is not alone sufficient that a creditor should be thereby delayed, but the departure must also have been with that intent. The word ‘or’ in the statute of the 1 Jac. 1, e. … Continue reading Fowler v Padget: 8 Feb 1798
