Search Results for: Terrorism Act 2000 3(3)(b)

Click the case name for better results:

Lord Alton of Liverpool and Others v Secretary of Dtate for the Home Department: POAC 30 Nov 2007

The Mujaheddin-e-Khalq had been proscribed under the 2000 Act by the respondent. It now appealed against such proscription. Held: The organisation had in the past used terrorist methods, but had repeatedly now renounced the use of violence. The proscription could not be upheld. Sir Harry Ognall said: ‘We have reached the clear conclusion that the … Continue reading Lord Alton of Liverpool and Others v Secretary of Dtate for the Home Department: POAC 30 Nov 2007

Lord Alton of Liverpool and Others v Secretary of Dtate for the Home Department; POAC 30 Nov 2007

References: PC/02/2006 Links: swarb.co.uk, statewatch Coram: Sir Harry Ognall C, Boswell QC, Catchpole QC The Mujaheddin-e-Khalq had been proscribed under the 2000 Act by the respondent. It now appealed against such proscription. Held: The organisation had in the past used terrorist methods, but had repeatedly now renounced the use of violence. The proscription could not … Continue reading Lord Alton of Liverpool and Others v Secretary of Dtate for the Home Department; POAC 30 Nov 2007