Search Results for: Teaching and Higher Education Act 1998 22

Click the case name for better results:

Kebede, Regina (on The Application of) v Newcastle City Council: Admn 15 Feb 2013

The two brothers had had their asylum claims rejected but remained with temporary discretionary leave. They now sought judicial review of the refusal to them of financial assistance to go to university. Judges: Timothy Straker QC Citations: [2013] EWHC 355 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Education (Student Support) Regulations 2011 SI/2011/1986, Teaching and Higher Education Act … Continue reading Kebede, Regina (on The Application of) v Newcastle City Council: Admn 15 Feb 2013

Tigere, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills: SC 29 Jul 2015

After increasing university fees, the student loan system was part funded by the government. They introduced limits to the availability of such loans, and a student must have been lawfully ordinarily resident in the UK for three years before the day the academic year begins. The claimant came as a child with her mother some … Continue reading Tigere, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills: SC 29 Jul 2015

Regina v Secretary of State for Education and Employment ex parte Liverpool Hope University College: CA 15 Mar 2001

The college sought judicial review of regulations which precluded it from using in its title the name ‘university’ pending a appropriate order made in the Privy Council. The two name changes within a short period would cause great loss. The conditions which would have allowed non-interruption were impossible to meet. Reference was made to parliamentary … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for Education and Employment ex parte Liverpool Hope University College: CA 15 Mar 2001

Patmalniece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 16 Mar 2011

The claimant challenged as incompatible with EU law, the Regulations which restricted the entitlement to state pension credit to those entitled to reside in the UK. Held: The appeal failed (Majority). The conditions imposed by the Regulations were indirectly discriminatory. There was not an exact correspondence between the advantaged and disadvantaged groups and the protected … Continue reading Patmalniece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 16 Mar 2011