The extra and frequent attention to laundry for the incontinence of a claimant does not of itself warrant the provision of Attendance Allowance. Citations: Times 30-Jul-1996 Statutes: Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 64(2)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State … Continue reading Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer: CA 30 Jul 1996
Judges: Mummery, Latham Gage LJJ Citations: [2005] EWCA Civ 1746 Links: Bailii Statutes: Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 64 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Benefits Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238648
STATUTORY MATERNITY PAY – Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 – continuous employment – whether continuous employment sufficient to qualify for SMP Citations: [2019] UKFTT 674 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Benefits Updated: 19 November 2022; Ref: scu.646912
FTTTx Statutory sick pay – entitlement depending on ‘normal weekly earnings’ reaching NIC lower earnings limit – errors on one of two relevant payslips, supposedly corrected on the other – whether only the earnings actually paid during relevant period should be taken into account – not certain, but in present case yes – whilst in … Continue reading Spence v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 23 Mar 2012
Entitlement to Statutory Sick Pay – Whether average weekly payment below lower earnings level as a result of unlawful deduction from wages – Yes – Appeal dismissed – Section 163(2) Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 Citations: [2010] UKFTT 270 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Taxes – Other Updated: 20 October 2022; … Continue reading Seaton v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Jun 2010
STATUTORY SICK PAY: Social Security (Contributions and Benefits) Act 1992; whether decision making as to an award of SSP was flawed – no Citations: [2014] UKFTT 515 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Benefits Updated: 27 September 2022; Ref: scu.526858
The court was asked as to the lawfulness of the Secretary of State making deductions from ongoing social security benefit to recover the overpayment of incapacity benefit and the repayment of a social fund budgeting loan during the moratorium period of a debt relief order. Held: The Secretary of state could not deduct the sums … Continue reading Payne and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 26 Jul 2010
CORPORATION TAX – computation of profits – deductions – payments by Appellant before 2001 to employee benefit trust and after 2002 to family benefit trust – whether wholly and exclusively expended for the purposes of the Appellant’s trade – yes – whether Appellant’s profits computed in accordance with generally accepted accountancy practice – yes – … Continue reading Sempra Metals Ltd v Revenue and Customs: SCIT 7 Jul 2008
The claimant had been married with children. Her husband was accused of abuse of the children, and bailed to live away from home, and then convicted and imprisoned. The claimant applied for income support on the basis that she had been abandoned within the regulations. The Secretary of State appealed a finding that she had … Continue reading Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v W: CA 18 May 2005
The claimant shared child care with his former partner, but claimed that the system which gave the job-seeker’s child care supplement to one party only was discriminatory. Held: In such cases the supplement usually went to the mother, and this had a diverse impact on men. It was for the Secretary of State to justify … Continue reading Hockenjos v Secretary of State for Social Security (No 2): CA 21 Dec 2004
The claimant Reynolds challenged the differential treatment by age of jobseeker’s allowance. Carson complained that as a foreign resident pensioner, her benefits had not been uprated. The questions in each case were whether the benefit affected a ‘possession’ within the Convention or the discrimination was arbitrary so as to breach the applicants human rights. Held: … Continue reading Carson and Reynolds v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 17 Jun 2003
Judges: Lord Justice Chadwick, Pill LJ, Longmore LJ Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 641, [2002] 1 WLR 2322 Links: Bailii Statutes: Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 70(3), Social Security (Invalid Care Allowance) Regulations 1976 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Deane CA 23-Jun-2010 … Continue reading Tina Yasmin Flemming v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 10 May 2002
On an application to review an earlier incapacity benefit decision, the adjudicating officer or tribunal must first decide if a material change of circumstances existed since the decision, or whether the decision was founded upon some mistake. Only then should he pass on to question whether the ‘all work’ test is satisfied. The distinction between … Continue reading Regina v Social Security Commissioner, Ex Parte Chamberlain: QBD 7 Jul 2000
The claimant was an EC national who had become resident here but was not seeking work, since she cared for her children. The Secretary of State said that since she was not seeking work, she was not entitled to remain and should make arrangements to leave the UK. Held: The letter asking a claimant to … Continue reading Chief Adjudication Officer v Wolke; Remelien v Secretary of State for Social Security: HL 13 Nov 1997
An application for a social fund grant is to be assessed first according to need, and only then according to other relevant statutory factors. Citations: Times 20-Jan-1998 Statutes: Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 140(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Benefits Updated: 07 April 2022; Ref: scu.88064
EAT Unfair Dismissal: Constructive Dismissal – RACE DISCRIMINATION – Direct UNLAWFUL DEDUCTION FROM WAGES Constructive dismissal – section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996 – whether breach of the implied term – Malik and Anor v BCCI SA [1997] ICR 606 HL Race discrimination – sections 13(1), 23 and 136(2) Equality Act 2010 – direct discrimination … Continue reading Sharfudeen v T J Morris Ltd T/A Home Bargains: EAT 3 Mar 2017
Widowers claimed that, in denying them benefits which would have been payable to widows, the Secretary of State had acted incompatibly with their rights under article 14 read with article 1 of Protocol 1 and article 8 of the ECHR. Held: The Secretary’s appeal succeeded. Section 6 of the 1998 Act permitted the discrimination as … Continue reading Hooper and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: HL 5 May 2005
STATUTORY MATERNITY PAY – entitlement to SMP – termination of employment when going on maternity leave – conciliation by ACAS – whether COT3 agreement can compromise claim to SMP – held that SMP is payable – s203 Employment Rights Act 1996 – Section 164, Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 [2019] UKFTT 635 (TC) … Continue reading NVCS Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Statutory Maternity Pay – Entitlement To SMP): FTTTx 17 Oct 2019
The parties had gone through a ceremony of marriage in Columbia, being both women. After the relationship failed, the claimant sought a declaration that the witholding of the recognition of same-sex marriages recoginised in a foreign jurisdiction was an infringement of her human rights. Held: Such a relationship is recognised in England as a civil … Continue reading Wilkinson v Kitzinger and others: FD 31 Jul 2006
The Court was asked whether the United Kingdom is precluded, by Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, self-employed persons and members of their families moving within the Community, from imposing a requirement of residence in Great Britain as a condition of entitlement to Disability Living Allowance … Continue reading Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Tolley: SC 29 Jul 2015
The provision of an interpreter for a deaf person was included in range of care needed for attendance for Disability Living Allowance. Dealing with his soiled laundry was not so included: ‘In my opinion it is not enough to ask whether the act in question is done with the aim of keeping the disabled person … Continue reading Cockburn v Chief Adjudication Officer and Another and Secretary of State for Social Services v Fairey: HL 21 May 1997
Wrongful Refusal of Benefits The claimant was estranged from his family, but claimed re-imbursement of the expenses for his brother’s funeral. The respondent required him to establish that none of his siblings was in a better position than he to pay for the funeral, but he had no means of contacting them. Held: Deciding a … Continue reading Kerr v Department for Social Development (Northern Ireland): HL 6 May 2004
The claimant was a post operative male to female trans-sexual. She claimed that her human rights were infringed when she was still treated as a man for National Insurance contributions purposes, where she continued to make payments after the age at which a woman would have ceased payments thus causing harassment. A second claimant again … Continue reading Goodwin v The United Kingdom: ECHR 11 Jul 2002
The claimant appealed from refusal of payment of Bereavement Benefit and Widowed Parent’s Allowance on the grounds that she had neither married nor been civil partner of her deceased partner. She applied for judicial review of that decision on the . .
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
