Click the case name for better results:

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014

The claimant journalist sought disclosure of papers acquired by the respondent in its conduct of enquiries into the charitable Mariam appeal. The Commission referred to an absolute exemption under section 32(2) of the 2000 Act, saying that the exemption continued until the papers were destroyed, or for 20 years under the 1958 Act. Held: The … Continue reading Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014

All The Citizens and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and Others: Admn 29 Apr 2022

‘These two separate claims relate to the use for Government business of non-Governmental (‘private’) communication systems (particularly WhatsApp, Signal and private email). The Claimants’ case is that the use of such systems means that public records that should be retained are instead deleted or are otherwise not available to be preserved for the public record. … Continue reading All The Citizens and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and Others: Admn 29 Apr 2022

Heaton and Others v AXA Equity and Law Life Assurance Society plc and Another: HL 25 Apr 2002

The claimant had settled one claim in full and final satisfaction against one party, but then sought further damages from the defendant, for issues related to a second but linked contract. The defendant claimed the benefit of the settlement. Held: The question of whether such a settlement would prevent any further action depended upon the … Continue reading Heaton and Others v AXA Equity and Law Life Assurance Society plc and Another: HL 25 Apr 2002

Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: HL 14 Feb 1968

Exercise of Ministerial Discretion The Minister had power to direct an investigation in respect of any complaint as to the operation of any marketing scheme for agricultural produce. Milk producers complained about the price paid by the milk marketing board for their milk when compared with prices paid to producers in other regions. The Minister … Continue reading Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: HL 14 Feb 1968