Click the case name for better results:

Martin v Revenue and Customs (Money Laundering : Money Laundering): FTTTx 12 Mar 2019

MONEY LAUNDERING REGULATIONS – appellant registered as tax adviser -appellant failing to pay annual fees in protest against HMRC requirements for enhanced due diligence – registration cancelled – penalty imposed for carrying on business while unregistered – whether appellant’s conduct penalisable – held no, as regulation 33 Money Laundering Regulations 2007 does not apply to … Continue reading Martin v Revenue and Customs (Money Laundering : Money Laundering): FTTTx 12 Mar 2019

Baxendale-Walker v Law Society: CA 15 Mar 2007

The solicitor appealed a finding that he had given a reference which he knew to be inappropriate, and his consequential striking off. The tribunal had found his evidence manifestly untrue. Held: There were no grounds for disturbing the finding: ‘The reference was sought by a bank, in the context of money laundering regulations directed at … Continue reading Baxendale-Walker v Law Society: CA 15 Mar 2007

Clarke and Co v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 May 2012

FTTTX Money Laundering Regulations 2007- penalty for practising as an external accountant or tax adviser without being registered – whether HMRC took reasonable steps to advertise maintenance of register – whether appellant had taken all reasonable steps to comply – whether penalty appropriate Citations: [2012] UKFTT 300 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Taxes … Continue reading Clarke and Co v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 May 2012

David Lierens (T/A MBX Game Exchange) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Apr 2011

FTTTx Appeal against a penalty imposed for the non compliance with Regulation 26 of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 – appeal allowed in part – penalty reduced on the grounds that the penalty was not appropriate under Regulation 42(1) Citations: [2011] UKFTT 247 (TC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Money Laundering Regulations 2007 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading David Lierens (T/A MBX Game Exchange) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Apr 2011

N Bevan Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Other): FTTTx 7 Oct 2016

MONEY LAUNDERING – whether appellant had breached requirements of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 regarding the carrying out of customer due diligence monitoring business relationships keeping adequate records and maintaining appropriate risk sensitive policies and procedures – yes-whether penalty of andpound;3750 imposed appropriate-penalty reduced to andpound;3094 [2016] UKFTT 674 (TC) Bailii Money Laundering Regulations 2007 … Continue reading N Bevan Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Procedure : Other): FTTTx 7 Oct 2016

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Clyde and Co LLP and Another v van Winkelhof: SC 21 May 2014

Solicitor Firm Member was a Protected Worker The solicitor appellant had been a member of the firm, a limited liability partnership. She disclosed criminal misbehaviour by a partner in a branch in Africa. On dismissal she sought protection as a whistleblower. This was rejected, it being found that a member of such a firm was … Continue reading Clyde and Co LLP and Another v van Winkelhof: SC 21 May 2014

Regina v Soneji and Bullen: HL 21 Jul 2005

The defendants had had confiscation orders made against them. They had appealed on the basis that the orders were made more than six months after sentence. The prosecutor now appealed saying that the fact that the order were not timely did not invalidate them. Held: The appeal was allowed. The confiscation orders made by the … Continue reading Regina v Soneji and Bullen: HL 21 Jul 2005

Dow Jones and Co Inc v Jameel: CA 3 Feb 2005

Presumption of Damage in Defamation is rebuttable The defendant complained that the presumption in English law that the victim of a libel had suffered damage was incompatible with his right to a fair trial. They said the statements complained of were repetitions of statements made by US authorities. The claimant had asserted that no more … Continue reading Dow Jones and Co Inc v Jameel: CA 3 Feb 2005

Westminster City Council v National Asylum Support Service: HL 17 Oct 2002

The applicant sought assistance from the local authority. He suffered from spinal myeloma, was destitute and an asylum seeker. Held: Although the Act had withdrawn the obligation to provide assistance for many asylum seekers, those who were infirm and whose infirmity was not a consequence of their destitution, had not been excluded. Only able bodied … Continue reading Westminster City Council v National Asylum Support Service: HL 17 Oct 2002

Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company Limited v Veitch: HL 15 Dec 1941

The plaintiffs sought an interdict against the respondents, a dockers’ union, who sought to impose an embargo on their tweeds as they passed through the port of Stornoway. Held: A trade embargo was not tortious because the predominant purpose of the conspirators was to protect their own interests, not to damage those of the plaintiffs. … Continue reading Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company Limited v Veitch: HL 15 Dec 1941

Ready Mixed Concrete Southeast Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance: QBD 8 Dec 1967

Contracts of service or for services In three cases appeals were heard against a finding as to whether a worker was entitled to have his employer pay National Insurance contributions on his behalf which would apply if he were an employee. He worked as an ‘owner-driver’ Held: The court asked what was the test of … Continue reading Ready Mixed Concrete Southeast Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance: QBD 8 Dec 1967

Clyde and Co Llp and Another v Bates van Winkelhof: CA 26 Sep 2012

The claimant was a solicitor partner with the appellant limited liability partnership at their offices in Tanzania. She disclosed what she believed to be money laundering by a local partner. She was dismissed. She had just disclosed her pregnancy and claimed also in sex discrimination. The company appealed findings as to jurisdiction saying that she … Continue reading Clyde and Co Llp and Another v Bates van Winkelhof: CA 26 Sep 2012