The claimant sought judicial review of the magistrates refusal to set aside a conviction entered in his absence. He had been in custody and not produced for the hearing.
Held: The review was granted. The judge had not established that the . .
The defendant had been convicted of speeding. At the time the road was thought to be subject to the 30 mph limit but was in fact subject only to the national speed limit. Her solicitors had delayed their application for judicial review.
Held: . .
Citations: [1998] EWHC Admin 636 Links: Bailii Statutes: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 16, Magistrates Courts Act 1980 142(1) Criminal Practice, Magistrates Updated: 27 May 2022; Ref: scu.138757
Once the charges had been withdrawn by the prosecutor, the former defendant was no longer an accused, and the magistrates had no power to re-open the case to alter an order for costs they had made. Citations: Times 27-Jul-1998 Statutes: Magistrates Courts Act 1980 142(1) Cited by: Cited – Regina v Thames Magistrates’ Court ex … Continue reading Coles v Camborne Justices: QBD 27 Jul 1998
