The tenant served by recorded delivery a counter-notice. On the day it was first delivered, nobody was available to sign for it. The landlord claimed it was out of date. Held: The statutory fiction was just that. A letter was deemed to be served on the it would have been served in the normal course … Continue reading WX Investments Ltd v Begg: ChD 13 May 2002
The rent review notice was sent by recorded delivery, and received and signed for at the demised premises. The lease incorporated the statutory presumption as to service in section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925.
Held: The Court . .
The deadline for giving notice of a rent review to the tenant was 30 June. The notice was posted recorded delivery on 28 June, but it was not received and signed for until 1 July. The issue was whether it was deemed, under section 196(4) of the 1925 . .
Notice of dismissal begins when received by worker The court was asked: ‘If an employee is dismissed on written notice posted to his home address, when does the notice period begin to run? Is it when the letter would have been delivered in the ordinary course of post? Or when it was in fact delivered … Continue reading Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood: SC 25 Apr 2018