Acts
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
A husband and wife crossed a road. The wife, appreciating that the danger from the traffic, ran across. The husband stood in the middle of the road and then went ahead, but was struck by a vehicle and injured. He was significantly affected by alcohol, and evidence had been led at the trial indicating the … Continue reading Liddell v Middleton: CA 17 Jul 1995
Vyner was working a circular saw when part of his thumb was cut off. The saw failed in several respects to comply with the Woodworking Machinery Regulations, and in particular the guard was not properly adjusted. The accident happened before the passing of the 1945 Act, and the main defence was contributory negligence. Held: Scott … Continue reading Vyner v Waldenberg Brothers Ltd: CA 1946
Citations: [1947-1951] CLC 6706 Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Distinguished – Tennant Radiant Heat Ltd v Warrington Development Corporation 1988 A property comprised a large building let on fully repairing leases of 22 units. The many rain outlets were allowed to become blocked, and water accumulated above … Continue reading Grant v Sun Shipping Co: 1947
A property comprised a large building let on fully repairing leases of 22 units. The many rain outlets were allowed to become blocked, and water accumulated above one unit before that part of the roof collapsed. The landlord appealed a finding that since the roof was not comprised in any of the leases, there was … Continue reading Tennant Radiant Heat Ltd v Warrington Development Corporation: 1988
The judge at first instance had set the level of contributory negligence too high. He looked at the defendant’s apparent folly rather than looking to the defendant’s folly in exposing the defendant to the risk, and promoting that folly by providing free drinks. Judges: Auld, Ward LJJ Citations: Times 01-Feb-1999, [1999] EWCA Civ 588 Statutes: … Continue reading Brannan v Airtours Plc: CA 18 Jan 1999
The claimant was severely injured when a car driven by the defendant crashed. No-one was wearing a seat belt. The driver died. The driver’s estate argued that the claimant was contributorily negligent in not wearing a seat belt. The claimant said that the failure had not contributed to his actual injuries. Held: Having regard to … Continue reading Stanton v Collinson: QBD 2 Mar 2009
A lender’s imprudent lending policies could be taken into account and set off against damages for negligent valuation as contributory negligence. Citations: Gazette 08-Jan-1998, Times 15-Jan-1998, [1997] EWCA Civ 3071 Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Platform Home Loans Ltd v Oyston Shipways Ltd and … Continue reading Platform Homes Limited v Oyston Shipways Limited and others: CA 19 Dec 1997
The claimant sought damages for serious personal injury, saying that the defendant had deliberately or recklessly driven at him as a pedestrian, knocking him over. The defendant had been tried and acquitted of motoring offences. He said that the claimant and his friends were drunk and had pulled down there trousers to insilt him, and … Continue reading Ayres v Odedra: QBD 18 Jan 2013
Extra Division, Inner House. The pursuer, a child, alighted from a school bus, and, on emerging into the road was hit by a car driven by the defender, suffering serious injury. She now appealed against a finding that she was 90% responsible for her injuries. Held: The Division allowed the pursuer’s appeal and assessed her … Continue reading Jackson v Murray and Another: SCS 27 Dec 2012
The claimant sought damages saying that her house had been damaged by subsidence after dessication of the soil by trees under the defendant’s control. Held: The defendants were liable. Judges: Edwards-Stuart J Citations: [2012] EWHC 2257 (TCC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 1(1) Citing: Cited – Berent v Family Mosaic Housing … Continue reading Robbins v London Borough of Bexley: TCC 16 Aug 2012
Outer House – (Opinion) The pursuer child came out of a school bus and ran into the road behind it, being hit by a car driven by the defender. The court was asked as to the proprotions of responsibility. Held: The pursuer was 90% responsible. The defender had failed to drive with reasonable care and … Continue reading Jackson v Murray: SCS 14 Jun 2012
Contributory negligence is no defence to a claim which was made out strictly in contract only. Citations: Gazette 29-Jun-1994, Times 11-May-1994, [1994] EWCA Civ 3, [1995] QB 214, [1995] 1 All ER 289, [1994] 3 WLR 1057 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 1(1), 4 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See also … Continue reading Barclays Bank Plc v Fairclough Building Ltd: CA 11 May 1994
The claimant had been injured, being hit by the defendant’s bus. Judges: Ward, Richards, Patten LJJ Citations: [2012] EWCA Civ 628 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 1(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Adopted – Eagle v Chambers CA 24-Jul-2003 The claimant was severely injured when run down by the defendant driving … Continue reading Rehill v Rider Holdings Ltd: CA 16 May 2012
Judges: Irwin J Citations: [2011] EWHC 1546 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 1 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Principal hearing – Kotula v EDF Energy Networks (Epn) Plc and Others QBD 15-Jun-2010 The claimant cyclist sought damages for severe personal injury. He was walking or riding his cycle through some … Continue reading Kotula v EDF Energy Networks (EPN) Plc and Others: QBD 17 Jun 2011
Judges: Christopher Clarke J Citations: [2009] EWHC 2997 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 1(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Principal judgment – Toropdar v D QBD 20-Mar-2009 The claimant car driver sought a declaration that he was not responsible for an accident. He had been driving along when the 10 … Continue reading Toropdar v D: QBD 2 Oct 2009
The court refused to allow the defendants to amend their defence so as to rely upon the second limb of the definition of fault in the 1945 Act as grounds for reducing a claim for deceit. Judges: Mummery J Citations: [1994] 2 EGLR 229, [1993] 1 WLR 1462 Statutes: Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 … Continue reading Alliance and Leicester Building Society v Edgestop: ChD 1993
A child aged 10 had crossed the road without taking reasonable care to check whether traffic was coming. She was struck by a driver who was driving at an appropriate speed but had failed to notice her, and could have avoided her if he had been paying proper attention. Held: The assessment of the child’s … Continue reading McCluskey v Wallace: SCS 14 May 1998
The claimant was a victim of the Ladbroke Grove rail crash. He later committed and was convicted of a manslaughter and detained under the 1983 Act. He said that the accident had caused a major personality change. The defendant relied on the defence of ex turpi causa non oritur actio. Held: The claimant’s appeal succeeded. … Continue reading Gray v Thames Trains Ltd and Another: CA 25 Jun 2008
The council had dismissed all workers within a group of employees, and invited them to re-apply for their jobs. The council now appealed a protective award made on the basis that there had been inadequate consultation with the union. Held: The court refused permission to raise a new point of law not argued below as … Continue reading Unison v Leicestershire County Council: CA 29 Jun 2006
EAT Practice and Procedure -and- Disability DiscriminationAppellant’s application to raise a new point on appeal (that the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 applies to Disability Discrimination Act 1995 section 8(3) damages) was refused as the Employment Tribunal had already decided, at its liability hearing, to deduct 40% from unfair dismissal compensation and had not … Continue reading The Blackpool Fylde and Wyre Society for the Blind v Begg: EAT 31 Mar 2005
TCC Contract – Project Management – Role of Quantity Surveyor acting as Project Manager – Duty to warn clients of fire hazards – Causation – Contributory Negligence – Test whether defendants are Partnership or Limited Company – role of experts in relation to evidence of Project Management Judges: John Toulmin CMG QC Citations: [2001] 76 … Continue reading Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall and Partners: TCC 4 May 2000
DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Compensation DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Loss/mitigation DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Burden of proof The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 can apply to some discrimination claims, but reduction of an award for contributory negligence would rarely, if ever, be justified because of the difficulties in applying the concept of ‘fault’ to the victim of … Continue reading First Greater Western Ltd and Another v Waiyego: EAT 6 Dec 2018
A collision occurred between a motor car and a cyclist. The driver appealed a finding that he had been driving too quickly, and that that was a cause of the accident. The claimant had cut across a right hand corner of the narrow unmarked lane. The lane had high hedges. The cyclist was 60% to … Continue reading Lamoon v Fry: CA 29 Apr 2004
The claimant pedestrian had been injured when hit by a car driven by the defendant as she stepped into the roadway. Both parties appealed against the assessment of contributory negligence. The claimant had a blood alcohol level three times that which would have been lawful for a driver. Held: The appeal was dismissed. The judge’s … Continue reading Lunt v Khelifa: CA 22 May 2002
The claimant was severely injured when run down by the defendant driving his car. She was in Blackpool, and drunk and wandering in the highway. The defendant was himself at or near the drink driving limit. She appealed against a finding that she was 60% to blame. Held: Courts have consistently required drivers to recognise … Continue reading Eagle v Chambers: CA 24 Jul 2003
Where the losses to a lender arising from a claim against a solicitor could properly be seen as in breach of an implied term requiring a retainer to be exercised with reasonable care and skill, that was akin to a claim for negligence, and contributory negligence of the lender could be applied to reduce the … Continue reading UCB Bank Plc v Hepherd Winstanley and Pugh (a Firm): CA 29 Jul 1999
The female plaintiff had been injured in a collision caused by the concurrent negligence of her husband and the defendant. She could not succeed in a negligence action against her husband, so the defendant could not recover under the Law Reform (Married Women and Tortfeasors) Act 1935 any contribution to the damages awarded against the … Continue reading Drinkwater v Kimber: CA 1952
The plaintiff sought damages after being injured when a co-worker fired a shot. The employee however had himself coupled the detonator to the cable rather than leaving it to the shotfirer, and had his cimmitted a criminal offence. He had been found a quarter responsible, and the NCB sought to rely on the doctrine of … Continue reading National Coal Board v England: HL 1954
Two ships had collided. A third itself ran aground trying to avoid them, and its ownes sought damages. Held: The unit approach to apportionment of damages was wrong.Lord Morris said of section 1 of the 1911 Act: ‘The section calls for inquiry as to fault, and inquiry as to damage or loss, and inquiry as … Continue reading The Miraflores and The Abadesa: PC 1967
The court considered the apportionment of responsibility under the 1945 Act.Lord Denning MR said: ‘We have been referred to cases on this subject, particularly the recent case of Brown v Thompson [1968] 1 WLR 1003. Since that case it seems to have been assumed in some quarters that this court will rarely, if ever, alter … Continue reading Kerry v Carter: CA 1969
The police were not under any duty to protect someone who had been arrested from injuring himself in an attempt to escape. The claimant had a history of seeking to avoid capture by jumping from his flat window. On this occasion he injured himself in the fall. The doctrine of ex turpi no oritur actio … Continue reading Vellino v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: CA 31 Jul 2001
A car driver drove into the back of a stationary lorry but was nevertheless held only 20% responsible. Held: A court of appeal should only exceptionally interfere with a judge’s apportinment of responsibility for an accident.Winn LJ said: ‘When it is necessary for a court to ascribe liability in proportions to more than one person, … Continue reading Brown v Thompson: CA 1968
A contract of insurance and a facultative reinsurance, under which part of the original risk was reinsured, contained warranties in identical terms. Held: The warranty in the reinsurance policy, which was governed by English law, should be construed so that it had the same effect as the warranty in the insurance which was governed by … Continue reading Forsikringsaktieselskapt Vesta v Butcher: HL 1988
Plaintiff to take own responsibility for damage The question was whether the fault of the deceased’s fellow workman, they both having disobeyed their foreman’s instructions, was to be regarded as having contributed to the accident. Held: A plaintiff must ‘share in the responsibility for the damage’ for the Act to apply, and this involves consideration … Continue reading Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd: HL 25 Jun 1953
Claim for return of money said to be held for the claimant’s benefit by a stockbroker. Held: Rose J dismissed the dishonest assistance claim because Daiwa’s employees had acted honestly. However, she upheld the negligence claim, while making a deduction of 25% under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 to reflect the contributory fault … Continue reading Singularis Holdings Ltd v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd: ChD 16 Feb 2017
Appeal by the owners of a factory which suffered fire damage against a judgment dismissing their action. The owners claimed damages against the manufacturers of a device which, they said, should have prevented the fire from occurring. This takes us back to the basic principles of the law of tort and in particular to Donoghue … Continue reading Howmet Ltd v Economy Devices Ltd and Others: CA 31 Aug 2016
The claimant cyclist sought damages for severe personal injury. He was walking or riding his cycle through some roadworks by the roadside, and fell out through roadside barriers into the path of a car. The defendants admitted that the path was less wide than it should have been, but said he should not have been … Continue reading Kotula v EDF Energy Networks (Epn) Plc and Others: QBD 15 Jun 2010
The claimant’s car had cut out while being driven on a motorway. The driver had been able to pull onto chevrons at a junction but not onto the hard shoulder. The defendant drove into the rear of the vehicle. Held: The driver had attempted to get to the hard shoulder but failed. The highway code … Continue reading Hughes v Guise Motors Ltd: QBD 1 Nov 2007
When a contract is to be construed purposively, the court must look to the purposes of both parties, not just one of them. No apportionment was to be applied under the 1945 Act: ‘Similarly, we think that the facts and circumstances of the present case are such that it can and should be easily distinguished … Continue reading Bank of Nova Scotia v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd (The Good Luck): CA 1990
A plaintiff brought an action for damages for personal injury against the drivers of two cars. Held: There are two aspects to apportioning responsibility between a plaintiff and defendant in an action for negligence, the respective causative potency of what they have done, and their respective blameworthinessDenning LJ said: ‘If they were both found guilty … Continue reading Davies v Swan Motor Co (Swansea) Ltd: CA 1949
The claimant appealed against rejection of his claim for personal injuries. He had been driving a Land Rver whilst on active duty in Afghanistan. He said that he was known not to be properly qualified to drive. Held: The appeal was allowed. Once it was known to the defendants that the claimant was to be … Continue reading Birch v Ministry of Defence: CA 14 Jun 2013
The plaintiffs had lent about 1 million pounds on the security of property negligently valued at 1.5 million pounds. The property was sold for much less than that and the plaintiffs suffered a loss of 680,000 pounds. The judge found that the plaintiffs had been contributorily negligent in failing to note that the borrowers had … Continue reading Platform Home Loans Ltd v Oyston Shipways Ltd and others: HL 18 Feb 1999
Fraudulent Misrepresentation by Company Director Fraudulent bills of lading had been issued in order to rely upon letters of credit issued by the bank. The director signing the bills sought to avoid personal liability, saying it was the Act of the company. The defendant company also appealed on the basis that the claimant bank had … Continue reading Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation and Others and Another and Others (Nos 2 and 4): HL 6 Nov 2002
The claimant cyclist suffered serious injury in a collision with a car driven by the defendant. The defendant appealed against a finding that he was two thirds responsible. The case for the injured cyclist was that the motorist was going too fast. The case of the motorist was that the accident would probably still have … Continue reading Phethean-Hubble v Coles: CA 21 Mar 2012
The court asked what reduction if any should be made to a plaintiff’s damages where injuries were caused not only by the defendant’s negligent driving but also by the failure of the plaintiff to wear a seat belt. It had been submitted that, since the defendant was not responsible for the failure of the plaintiff … Continue reading Froom v Butcher: CA 21 Jul 1975
Child not entirely free of responsibility The claimant child, left a school bus and stepped out from behind it into the path of the respondent’s car. She appealed against a finding of 70% contributory negligence. Held: Her appeal succeeded (Majority, Lord Hodge and Lord Wilson dissenting). Her contribution was assessed at 50%. The court rejected … Continue reading Jackson v Murray and Another: SC 18 Feb 2015
The plaintiff, a pedestrian had been struck by the defendant’s car while crossing the road. The plaintiff had negligently failed to see the defendant’s car approaching. The defendant had a clear view of the plaintiff prior to the collision, but was driving at an excessive speed or failing to keep a proper look-out or both. … Continue reading Chapman v Hearse, Baker v Willoughby: HL 26 Nov 1969
Where a deceit was established leading to an award of damages, that award of damages was not capable of being reduced under the 1949 Act through a contribution to the loss occasioned by the claimant’s own behaviour, where that behaviour did not fall . .
Once relevant fault on the part of the plaintiff has been established, a reduction on account of his fault in the damages recoverable is obligatory Stephenson LJ: ‘Speaking for myself, I do not find that the words of section 1(1) of the Law Reform . .