‘Occupation’ by a tenant does not require physical occupation by him for him to have the right to renew the lease under the Act. A market operator letting all the stalls in a market area was a protected tenant. Judges: Lord Nicholls Citations: Gazette 13-Apr-1994, Times 02-Mar-1994 Statutes: Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 23(1) Part … Continue reading Graysim Holdings Ltd v P and O Property Holdings Ltd: CA 2 Mar 1994
The tenant claimed Rent Act protection for his tenancy. He had been rehoused and began his tenancy in 1970 with the ground floor used as a shop, and the first floor as living accomodation. He later abandoned the business use. He appealed a finding that he did not have protection under the 1977 Act. Held: … Continue reading Tan and Another v Sitkowski: CA 1 Feb 2007
The Local Authority were lessees of some 500 square metres of public open space at St. Johns Hill in Wandsworth, which they and their horticultural sub-contractors visited periodically. It had been used by local inhabitants for leisure and recreation. Held: The use was sufficient to constitute occupation: ‘The concept [of sufficiency of physical presence and … Continue reading Wandsworth London Borough Council v Singh: CA 1991
The tenant had acquired from the defendant a lease of access rights to its premises. It sought a renewed tenancy under the 1954 Act.
Held: A lease of an easement on its own was not a lease of premises, and the tenancy was not protected under . .
The lease included a right to use seven designated parking spaces. The parties disputed whether parking space could be occupied in such a way as to be given protection under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Held: A parking space is an . .
A landlord gave notice to the original lessees of business premises, under section 17 of the 1995 Act. It was sent by recorded delivery to the lessees’ last known residential address but was returned to the sender by the Royal Mail. Nevertheless the landlord contended that there had been good service under section 23(1) of … Continue reading Commercial Union Life Assurance Co Ltd v Moustafa: 1999
The tenant had a lease of business premises. The premises were damaged in a terrorist attack, and the landlord served a notice terminating the lease. The lease gave the right to the landlord to determine the lease if the property was incapable of occupation for more than six months. It came to be accepted that … Continue reading Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd: CA 30 Apr 2002
Protection was sought under the 1954 Act for premises where the relevant occupation was partly residential and partly for the purposes of a business. Held: The Act will apply so long as the business activity is a significant purpose of occupation. It must be more than incidental. The business occupation must exist both at the … Continue reading Cheryl Investments v Saldanha: CA 1978
A landlord’s notice under section 4 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 had been served on the tenant’s solicitors, who had confirmed that they had authority to accept service. Later the tenant challenged the validity of the service. Held: Service of a notice under the Act on the tenant’s solicitors was valid and effective. … Continue reading Galinski v McHugh: 5 Oct 1988
