Search Results for: Insolvency Act 1986 167

Click the case name for better results:

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Greenhaven Motors Limited (In Liquidation) and Another v BG Funding Limited and Another: CA 31 Jul 1998

Citations: [1998] EWCA Civ 1365 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 167 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – In re Edennote Ltd (No 2) ChD 1997 Sanction was sought against a liquidator. Lightman J said: ‘The question is the commercial best interests of the company, reflected prima facie, by the commercial judgment of the liquidator, a … Continue reading Greenhaven Motors Limited (In Liquidation) and Another v BG Funding Limited and Another: CA 31 Jul 1998

Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Rigby and others: CA 19 Jan 2005

Appeal against strike out of application to have set aside deeds of assignment. Judges: Brooke VP, Arden LJJ Citations: [2005] EWCA Civ 276 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 167(3) 168(5) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – In Re Edennote Ltd; Tottenham Hotspur plc v Ryman CA 21-May-1996 The company was in liquidation. Terence … Continue reading Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Rigby and others: CA 19 Jan 2005

In Re Edennote Ltd; Tottenham Hotspur plc v Ryman: ChD 1 Nov 1994

The company Edennote had been wound up on insolvency. It had a possible claim for fees against Tottenham, owned by Mr Sugare. The shareholder, Terry Venables, took an assignment of that action. An application was made to set aside the assignment and to remove the liquidator. Held: The application succeeded. The assignment of the action … Continue reading In Re Edennote Ltd; Tottenham Hotspur plc v Ryman: ChD 1 Nov 1994

Woodley v Woodley (2): CA 12 Apr 1993

A stay of execution of an order against matrimonial assets was not defeated by bankruptcy. As to the interplay of the Insolvency Rules and matrimonial proceedings. Balcombe LJ said: ‘I cannot leave this case without saying something about the effect of r 12.3 of the Insolvency Rules 1986. Before those rules came into force orders … Continue reading Woodley v Woodley (2): CA 12 Apr 1993

Clarke v Coutts and Co: CA 17 Jun 2002

The respondent bank had obtained a charging order nisi against the applicant’s property. The applicant then obtained an order under s252 of the act requiring any further action against his estate to be stayed. The bank nevertheless obtained an order absolute. The claimant was not represented at that hearing. Several years later he sought to … Continue reading Clarke v Coutts and Co: CA 17 Jun 2002

In Re A Debtor (No 90 of 1997): ChD 1 Jul 1998

Ordinarily the court would avoid two actions on similar facts where inconsistent decisions might be reached, but where issues on setting aside a statutory demand were genuinely separate, the separate actions could continue. Citations: Times 01-Jul-1998 Statutes: Insolvency Rules 1986 (1986 No 1925) 6.5.4(d) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Insolvency Updated: 24 July 2022; Ref: scu.81672

In re Beck Foods Ltd: Boston Borough Council v Rees and Bennett: CA 20 Dec 2001

The council appealed a decision that the administrative receivers of a company were not liable personally for the non-domestic rates otherwise incurred by a company during the receivership. Held: The activities of the receiver or manager were not activities creating a ratable occupation. The original business owner remained in occupation for this purpose. Judges: Lord … Continue reading In re Beck Foods Ltd: Boston Borough Council v Rees and Bennett: CA 20 Dec 2001

Digital Equipment Co Ltd and Others v Bower and Others: ChD 4 Dec 2003

The liquidators had lost their legal action, and had been ordered to pay the present claimants their costs. They sought payment out of an insolvency services account in competition with the solicitors for the liquidators. Held: An award of costs was not a payment of ‘expenses incurred in the winding up’ and therefore the court … Continue reading Digital Equipment Co Ltd and Others v Bower and Others: ChD 4 Dec 2003

Buchler and Another v Talbot and others: CA 22 Feb 2002

The company’s assets were subject to a floating charge. That had crystallised. The liquidators, after a voluntary winding up, sought to make the assets remaining after repayment of the sums secured, available to pay the costs of the winding up. The trustees of the debenture sought to appeal a finding that the assets were so … Continue reading Buchler and Another v Talbot and others: CA 22 Feb 2002

Regina v Clive Louden Carass: CACD 19 Dec 2001

When a defendant was accused of an offence under the section, and wished to raise a defence under sub-section 4, the duty of proof placed on him by the sub-section amounted to a duty to bring sufficient evidence to raise the defence, and the section did not transfer the burden from the prosecution. Held: To … Continue reading Regina v Clive Louden Carass: CACD 19 Dec 2001

Percy v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 21 Dec 2001

The defendant had been convicted of using words or behaviour likely to cause harassment alarm or distress, when she defaced the US flag, and stood on it before a US military officer. She said that the defacing of flags was a common form of protest, that she had no intention to cause alarm or distress, … Continue reading Percy v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 21 Dec 2001

In Re A Debtor No 638-Io-1994: ChD 3 Dec 1998

A modification to an Individual Voluntary Arrangement made under a clause of the arrangement allowing variations and which variations could have been included in the original deed was valid. Citations: Times 03-Dec-1998 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 263 (4) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Insolvency Updated: 19 May 2022; Ref: scu.81674

MacDonald and Another v Carnbroe Estates Ltd: SC 4 Dec 2019

‘This appeal concerns the Scots law of gratuitous alienations on insolvency. It raises three principal questions. First, there is a question as to the interpretation of the term ‘adequate consideration’ in section 242(4)(b) of the Insolvency Act 1986. Secondly, there is the question whether the Inner House was entitled to interfere with the Lord Ordinary’s … Continue reading MacDonald and Another v Carnbroe Estates Ltd: SC 4 Dec 2019

Dow Jones and Co Inc v Jameel: CA 3 Feb 2005

Presumption of Damage in Defamation is rebuttable The defendant complained that the presumption in English law that the victim of a libel had suffered damage was incompatible with his right to a fair trial. They said the statements complained of were repetitions of statements made by US authorities. The claimant had asserted that no more … Continue reading Dow Jones and Co Inc v Jameel: CA 3 Feb 2005

HM Revenue and Customs v Ariel: ChD 8 Jul 2016

The trustee in bankruptcy appealed against an order as to compliance with statutory notices issued by HMRC. The trustee argued that all but one of the orders was made in excess of jurisdiction. Mann J [2016] EWHC 1674 (Ch) Bailii Insolvency Act 1986 303, Finance Act 2008 Sch 36 England and Wales Insolvency, Taxes Management … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Ariel: ChD 8 Jul 2016

Kahn and Another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue; In re Toshoku Finance plc: HL 20 Feb 2002

A company went into liquidation, being owed substantial sums by another company in the same group, but itself insolvent. A settlement did not include accrued interest, but was claimed to be taxed as if it had, and on an accruals basis. If so, was this an expense properly arising in the insolvency, and payable as … Continue reading Kahn and Another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue; In re Toshoku Finance plc: HL 20 Feb 2002

Regina v Kansal (2): HL 29 Nov 2001

The prosecutor had lead and relied at trial on evidence obtained by compulsory questioning under the 1986 Act. Held: In doing so the prosecutor was acting to give effect to section 433. The decision in Lambert to disallow retrospective effect of Human Rights decisions in appeal cases may have been incorrect, but will be followed. … Continue reading Regina v Kansal (2): HL 29 Nov 2001