Click the case name for better results:

Crown Prosecution Service, Regina (on the Application of) v Bow Street Magistrates Court and others: Admn 18 Jul 2006

The defendants were said to have been found in possession of false passports. They successfully argued that the offence charged under the 1981 Act had been repealed by the 2006 Act. The prosecutor argued that a Schedule only came into effect when explicitly made to come into effect. Held: The prosecutor’s appeal succeeded. The 2006 … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service, Regina (on the Application of) v Bow Street Magistrates Court and others: Admn 18 Jul 2006

Office of Government Commerce (Decision Notice): ICO 5 Oct 2006

ICO This Decision Notice has been issued against the OGC following communications between the Commissioner, HM Treasury and the OGC, subsequent to which it has been accepted that the information requested by the complainant in the case of FS50083104 was in fact a request to the OGC and not HM Treasury. The Decision Notice issued … Continue reading Office of Government Commerce (Decision Notice): ICO 5 Oct 2006

Office of Government Commerce (Decision Notice): ICO 31 Jul 2006

ICO The complainant made a request for information about Gateway Reviews of the identity cards programme which had been carried out by the OGC, who refused to provide the information on the grounds that it related to the formulation and development of government policy (section 35) and that disclosure would prejudice the exercise of its … Continue reading Office of Government Commerce (Decision Notice): ICO 31 Jul 2006

Home Office (Decision Notice): ICO 23 Jan 2006

ICO On 1 January 2005 the complainant requested information regarding the compatibility of the Identity Cards Bill and the Human Rights Act. The Home Office acknowledged receipt of the request on the 6 January 2005 but failed to respond to the request within 20 working days; writing to the complainant on 2 February 2005 to … Continue reading Home Office (Decision Notice): ICO 23 Jan 2006

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Elmi, Rex v: CACD 2 Nov 2022

Judges: Lady Justice Whipple Mrs Justice Mcgowan And Mrs Justice Ellenbogen Citations: [2022] EWCA Crim 1428 Links: Bailii Statutes: Identity Cards Act 2006 25(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.682325

BYA, Rex v: CACD 13 Oct 2022

Appeal from old conviction on guilty plea. Judges: Lady Justice Simler Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb And Mrs Justice Cockerill Citations: [2022] EWCA Crim 1326 Links: Bailii, Judiciary Statutes: Identity Cards Act 2006 25(1)(c) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.681843

Regina v Zenasni: CACD 5 Sep 2007

The defendant appealed against a sentence of 15 months imprisonment for the use of a false identity card. On a street search he had been found to be holding the card. Judges: Toulson LJ, Davis, Underhill JJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 2165 Links: Bailii Statutes: Identity Cards Act 2006 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing … Continue reading Regina v Zenasni: CACD 5 Sep 2007

Rostamkhany, Regina v: CACD 19 Dec 2007

The applicant pleaded guilty to one count of possession or control of a false document with the intention of using it to establish a registrable fact. Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 3426 Links: Bailii Statutes: Identity Cards Act 2006 2591) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 28 July 2022; Ref: scu.278934

Regina v Soule, Ali; Regina v Bombatu: CACD 23 Jan 2007

The defendants sought leave to appeal their convictions for having in their possession false identity documents with the intention to use them to establish a fact registrable under the Act, saying that since the Act had not yet implemented any register they could not be guilty. Held: Leave was refused. The definitions in the section … Continue reading Regina v Soule, Ali; Regina v Bombatu: CACD 23 Jan 2007

Abdulahi, Regina v: CACD 15 Oct 2021

Judges: Lady Justice Simler DBE, Mr Justice Spencer, The Recorder of Liverpool, His Honour Judge Menary QC, (Sitting as a Judge of the Cacd) Citations: [2021] EWCA Crim 1629 Links: Bailii Statutes: Identity Cards Act 2006 25 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 08 April 2022; Ref: scu.669839

Zenati v Police of The Metropolis and Another: CA 11 Feb 2015

The claimant appealed against rejection of his claim for damages for false imprisonment and infringement of his human rights. On his arrest for a different offence his passport was suspected to be counterfeit, and he was then held for an offence under the 2006 Act. The police secured expert evidence from the National Document Fraud … Continue reading Zenati v Police of The Metropolis and Another: CA 11 Feb 2015

Yousefi, Regina v: CACD 3 Jun 2020

Appeal from conviction of three identity document offences and five dishonesty offences. They were: one offence of possession of an improperly obtained identity document with intent, contrary to section 25(1)(b) of the Identity Cards Act 2006 (count 1), two offences of possession of an identity document with improper intention, contrary to section 4(1) and (2) … Continue reading Yousefi, Regina v: CACD 3 Jun 2020

SXH v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 6 Feb 2014

The claimant challenged being charged with an offence under the 2006 Act, saying that it engaged and interfered with her Article 8 Human Rights. A Somali national, she fled, claiming asylum here, but her travel documents were found to be false. All agreed that she could not have obtained valid documents in Somalia. Held: Her … Continue reading SXH v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 6 Feb 2014

Office Angels Ltd v Rainer-Thomas: CA 1991

Reasonability Test of Post Employment Restriction The court re-stated the principles applicable in testing whether an employee’s restrictive covenant was reasonable: ‘The court cannot say that a covenant in one form affords no more than adequate protection to a covenantee’s relevant legitimate interests if the evidence shows that a covenant in another form, much less … Continue reading Office Angels Ltd v Rainer-Thomas: CA 1991