Click the case name for better results:

Jordeson v Sutton, Southcotes and Drypool Gas Co: 1899

The defendants owned land adjacent to that of the plaintiff’s. Both plots were buillt over a deep substratum of wet sand, known as ‘running silt’. The defendants, in order to continue a development, drained the running silt under their own land, but this in turn led to subsidence in the plaintiff’s land as the silt … Continue reading Jordeson v Sutton, Southcotes and Drypool Gas Co: 1899